answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Hitler was asleep and no one dared wake him up.

Rommel was on Holiday.

No one, absolutely no one dared to take the initiative.

The allied deception plan was effective.

The allies had almost complete air superiority.

The French Resistance was highly effective in the rear of the lines.

The massive defense plan had made inadequate preperations for an air assault.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were the Germans so slow to respond to the invasion of Normandy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Why Nazi was defeated at Normandy?

because they thought the main invasion would come at pa de calais. when the invasion eventually came in Normandy the Germans could not counterattak because they needed hitlers permission and he was still asleep and noone wanted to wake him. when they did finally counter attack all they could do was slow up the mass of troops comin into France daily. their defeat was by no means rommels fault or the fighting Germans. also the allieds ability to prevent the Germans knowing about the invasion. the parachute operations on eitherside of Normandy prevented the Germans from getting organized.


As a result of the battle of the bulge the germans were able to?

Slow the allied invasion of germany summited by Douglas Fowler


Could an Allied invasion of Germany from the south - Italy across the Alps - have succeeded without establishing a front at Normandy?

It might conceivably have succeeded but the cost in lives would have been enormous. Mountainous territory is naturally easy to defend and high rugged mountains like the alps, with narrow passes, are extremely easy. Had we tried that strategy we would have lost many times more men than we did going through France. Michael Montagne I don't think the question is could the invasion of Germany from the south have succeeded without establishing a front at Normandy; but is could the front at Normandy have succeeded without the invasion of Germany from the south. Normandy was the main objective, not Italy. Italy was invaded to prevent Hitler's escape through the south; while the front established at Normandy was the main force with which the Allied forces took Nazi Germany. How, please, would they have passed on to Germany after defeating Italy? Turning to the east over Austria towards the Soviets? Turning to the west through the south of France? Attacking Switzerland, or what? That was close to what Churchill had in mind. His plan was to take Italy within a few months and then move up through Yugoslavia and into Vienna. It turned out that the Germans chose to fight a delayed withdrawal out of Italy. He truly thought that Vienna and the oil fields in the Balkans could be reached before the Normandy invasion(which was originally planned for an earlier date). When Sicily fell, Hitler had to choose someone to command the troops in the South (mainly Italy). Rommel submitted his plan of withdrawing to northern Italy. Kesselring proposed to set up a series of defensive positions that would slow the Allied advance and yet be able to respond to any amphibious landings behind their lines. Hitler gave the job to Kesselring and Rommel was placed in command of the Atlantic Wall. I believe a direct attack into Germany across the Alps might have made initial success as this was probably not well defended. But the logistic nightmare of supplying this move would have surely resulted in defeat very quickly when winter approached. Custermen


How many bombers and fighters did the Germans use in the battle of Britain?

On August 10 1940 the Germans had 875 high level bombers (Heinkel 111, Dornier 17 & Junkers Ju 88s) 316 dive bombers (Ju87 Stuka) & 929 fighters, mostly Messerschmitt Bf109s, of which 227 were Me 110s. The Stukas were soon withdrawn, because they were too slow against RAF fighters, to be used in the invasion, which as time would tell be in the East rather than against Britain.


What are the four themes of Russian history?

The four themes of RUssiann history are:1. Invasion and expansion2. Harsh treatment of the common people3. Slow westernization4. Autocratic government

Related questions

Why Nazi was defeated at Normandy?

because they thought the main invasion would come at pa de calais. when the invasion eventually came in Normandy the Germans could not counterattak because they needed hitlers permission and he was still asleep and noone wanted to wake him. when they did finally counter attack all they could do was slow up the mass of troops comin into France daily. their defeat was by no means rommels fault or the fighting Germans. also the allieds ability to prevent the Germans knowing about the invasion. the parachute operations on eitherside of Normandy prevented the Germans from getting organized.


What were the Germans able to do after the battle of the Bulge?

slow the allied invasion of Germany


As a result of the battle of the bulge the germans were able to?

Slow the allied invasion of germany summited by Douglas Fowler


As a result of the battle of the bulge the Germans were able to what?

The Germans held up the Allied advance for a week or more in the Battle of the Bulge, but ultimately it made little difference to the outcome of WWII. (NovaNet answer) slow the Allied invasion of Germany


Are Asians planning a slow invasion of North America?

No, as far as I know, they are not.


Why did Allied troops invade north Africa and Italy?

They were viewed as weaker points in the German Reich's armour than Normandy. Attacks in these areas should have been easier than an invasion of France and accomplished their mission of distracting large parts of Hitler's armies away from their slow destruction of Russia's armies.


Why does it take ages for boys to respond to girls texts?

because we type slow.


A plants response to stimuli could be slow or rapid but all plants respond to what?

h


What is more likely to be very slow to respond to stimuli animals or plants?

Planta


Why were towns in the thirteen colonies so slow to respond after the declaration?

The reason as to why they were so slow is because news didn't travel fast enough. They didn't have the technology we do today, so it took longer to reach the towns. This is why they didn't respond very quickly.


How did people and the authorities respond to the Kobe earthquake?

The authorities were slow to respond with emergency and rescue help after the Kobe earthquake. Government leaders had to request help from the SDF and they were slow to contact them. The Japanese gangsters, the yakuza, were helping people the day after the earthquake by handing out food.


Which best characterizes the League of Nation's response to the invasion of Ethiopia and Manchuria and the Rhineland?

Slow, but very effective