answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because ice cream has no bones.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were the articles of confederation considered weak and what event pointed out the worst of these weaknesses?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What effects did shays rebellion have on the articles of confederation?

Shays Rebellion pointed out the problems in the Articles of Confederation. This lead to the production of the Constitution.


After the Revolution what effect did Shays Rebellion have upon the country?

it pointed out the weaknesses of the declaration


What was the first battle of the Civil War that pointed out the Union's weaknesses?

bull run brooo!


Why is a megaphone not considered a cone?

because the front is not pointed


Why was shay's rebellion important to the founding fathers?

Shay's rebellion was important to the founding fathers because it pointed out that the government needed strengthening and it also pointed out the weakness of the articles.


Why did the mayans have flat pointed heads?

it was considered beauty at that time


What did Shays Rebellion pointed out the dangers of?

It showed the weaknesses of the Article of Confederation when dealing with armed conflicts. The government didn't have the right to create a standing army, hence they were not prepared to deal with rebellions such as Shays Rebellion.


Is it true that Congress adopted the Olive Branch Petition asking Parliament not to break from the colonies until a compromise could be worked out?

yes ========== It should be pointed out that that would be the Continental Congress, a somewhat loose organization which operated under the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution of the United States, and the Congress that has consinuously existed since being established did not exist until after the Revolutionary War.


Why is Shays's Rebellion so important to american history?

This rebellion caused people to realize that they needed a stronger government because they were unable to deal with Shay's Rebellion as successfully as they could have. The result of this rebellion was the creation of the Constitution in place of the Articles of Confederation.


Why is shays important?

It pointed out one the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the national government was unable to help Massachusetts when the governor called for national troops to put down the "rebellion." Farmers in western Massachusetts resented the fact that the state's tax laws favored trade at the expense of farming. The state legislature was composed mostly of merchants from Boston and other shipping towns and cities. In 1786, farmers assembled in conventions and demanded that their property tax be lowered. To make up for the loss of revenue, they called for the abolition of aristocratic branches of the government in Boston. A Revolutionary War veteran named Daniel Shays led about 2,000 armed men against the Springfield arsenal. The governor of Massachusetts asked for help from the national government but the government under the Articles was unable to act. The rebellion eventually collapsed but the problems continued.


Why is rebellion important?

It pointed out one the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the national government was unable to help Massachusetts when the governor called for national troops to put down the "rebellion." Farmers in western Massachusetts resented the fact that the state's tax laws favored trade at the expense of farming. The state legislature was composed mostly of merchants from Boston and other shipping towns and cities. In 1786, farmers assembled in conventions and demanded that their property tax be lowered. To make up for the loss of revenue, they called for the abolition of aristocratic branches of the government in Boston. A Revolutionary War veteran named Daniel Shays led about 2,000 armed men against the Springfield arsenal. The governor of Massachusetts asked for help from the national government but the government under the Articles was unable to act. The rebellion eventually collapsed but the problems continued.


Does the anti federalist or the federalist make a stronger agreement and you?

Actually both sides had a good argument. AAt the time I would say that the federalists had the better argument only because they were for the Constitution. But, although they had a good improvment to the Articles of Confederation, many antifederalists made a very good point about a possible tyranny or oppressive rule by giving the central government (the president) power to tax and control the army. The Bill of Rights was also stongly enforced by the antifederalists, which was important to add to the laws. Overall, I think that federalists had the better argument. Benjamin Franklin was a federalist also, and he pointed out that the Constitution was not perfect, but it was about as good as it gets. It is hard to make a central government, and the Constitution was a very good improvment to the Articles of Confederation. It is also a matter of oppinion, so really is your choice of who had the better argument.