0
because they all were on your mother
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was the first crusade so successful?
The first crusade was so successful, because the muslim defenders were so un unified.
Were the Crusaders ever able to conquer the entire Holy Land?
Well the holy land is Jerusalem so yes in the first crusade.
Why were there so many crusades?
the first crusade was a success so later kings thought they could direct successful crusades too cause Muslims recaptured Jerusalem after first crusade but all other crusades failed
The Fourth Crusade was launched by who?
The fourth crusade was launched by the pope. It proved to be really disastrous. The crusaders stole valuable pieces of art, burned libraries so they can pay off their debt to Venice bankers.
What were the overall results of the Crusades?
Only the First Crusade was successful because of the disunity of the Muslims, but all the others were failures. However, the Third Crusade came close to success but the king of England heard his realm was rebelling, so he abandoned the crusade. (pretty much the tale of robin hood).
Why was the first crusade so successful?
The first crusade was so successful, because the muslim defenders were so un unified.
Were the Crusaders ever able to conquer the entire Holy Land?
Well the holy land is Jerusalem so yes in the first crusade.
What city started the crusades?
Many cities were attackd by the crusaders. The most important two were:Jerusalem, captured by the crusaders of the First Crusade in 1099, with its entire population slaughtered, without concern whether they were Muslim or Christian.Constantinople, the capital of the Eastern Empire, which was sacked by the crusaders of the Fourth Crusade in 1204.
Why were there so many crusades?
the first crusade was a success so later kings thought they could direct successful crusades too cause Muslims recaptured Jerusalem after first crusade but all other crusades failed
The Fourth Crusade was launched by who?
The fourth crusade was launched by the pope. It proved to be really disastrous. The crusaders stole valuable pieces of art, burned libraries so they can pay off their debt to Venice bankers.
What were the overall results of the Crusades?
Only the First Crusade was successful because of the disunity of the Muslims, but all the others were failures. However, the Third Crusade came close to success but the king of England heard his realm was rebelling, so he abandoned the crusade. (pretty much the tale of robin hood).
Why was the crusaders so successful in the first place?
They weren't really that sucessful, they only held jarusalem for a few years before they were forced back. They mostly just harassed the locals.
Which crusade was most successful and why?
To answer this question in the most simplest form you must look at the aim of the crusades; although there were many secondary aims for the crusades the main reason from the first four crusades to embark was to capture Jerusalm, which had been help by the Muslims since 638AD. So taking this into respect the first crusade must have been the most successful because it was the only one out of the first four crusades to capture Jerusalm!
Why where there so many crusaders?
The crusaders won the first one but then Saladin called a Jihad onto the crusaders and captured Jerusalem. After that the christians tried to reclaim it but failed almost everytime and when they failed they tried again, and again.
What happened to Richard Lionhart in the First Crusade?
Richard the Lionhart was born 8th September 1189 ~ first Crusade was between 1095-1099 so he was not even born.
Why did many serfs decide to become crusaders?
BECAUSE they didnt want to be sold or stay in slavery so they chose to be a crusade to be free.
Why did so many people leave on the first crusade?
There seem to be a variety of reason - Jonathan Phillips seems to sum this up well when he describes there as probably being as many reasons for going on crusade as there were crusaders. Though the charters seem to overwhelmingly suggest that religious piety was the predominant factor in willingness to go on Crusade. Whilst the papacy offered to ensure the safety of property and possessions as part of taking up the cross the actual legal affairs regarding this weren't sorted until at least the end of the second crusade and there are examples of bishops actually referring crusading court cases to secular officials because they do not know to what extent their jurisdiction reaches.If you'd like more information on this then I highly recommend Jonathan Riley-Smith as a source on the justifications for going on crusade. His books are well renowned so you should not find it difficult to come across them. In particular his bookThe First Crusaders 1095-1131Pages 112-163 should be of help. (The 1997 version)Hope that's sufficient!
