In the US, such authority for government officials does not exist.
Parole Agents/Officers do not possess that power. Only judges and magistrates have the pwer to issue a warrant. However, the agent/officer can present an affidavit for a warrant to the court to support a request for the issuance of a warrant.
They can, but most prefer to be senior warrant officers as they usually have better pay, conditions and power than most officer ranks up to captain.
Apply to the probate court for the power. If the circumstances warrant it, they can grant that power.
Police officers are specially trained to read body language. If they think someone is acting strangely around their presence, for example avoiding eye contact or walking quickly, then officers have the power to stop and search that person on suspicion on criminal activity. They will ask that person for their details and to identify themselves too, in case there is an outstanding warrant on them. They do it to protect you, the member of public, from harm.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank. The tribune of the plebeians, who was the representative of the plebeians (commoners), but not an officer of state, also had to power of veto. The power to veto the actions of officers of state was the Roman system of checks and balances of power. It was meant to reduce the chance that the officers would abuse their power. The power of veto of the tribune of the plebeians was also meant to prevent the abuse of the commoners by the state.
K. Sathyanarayana has written: 'The power of humor at the workplace' -- subject(s): Humor in the workplace
The power to impeach
Regulating the workplace( gradpoint
the president
Chief minister