answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

He wouldnt. He made a very poor king, and was famous for how badly he treated the English, for instance in the Harrowing of the North. On his deathbed he admitted as much, saying "'I have cruelly oppressed them and ... killed innumerable multitudes by famine or the sword".

Resistance to Norman rule was widespread - another English king was crowned, and Hereward the Wake waged guerilla war against them in East Anglia, with the aid of England's ally Denmark, for a generation - while even after the harrowing, the north was never fully subjugated.

William was so despised that two centuries after, at the battle of Crecy - king Edward the third flew the White Dragon (Huitdraka) Banner as his battle standard - the banner of the king who fought William at Hastings.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would William the Conqueror make a good king after Edward?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was William the Conqueror a good king?

No.


Was William the Conqueror a good leader?

yes


Why is William the Conqueror so good?

William the Conqueror took England from the Danes in the Norman Conquest and established the English kingdom.


What good things did William the Conqueror do when he was king?

yes


What kind of man was William the Conqueror?

a good one lol xx


What type of leader was William the Conqueror?

He was a very good leader


What were William the Conqueror's weaknesses?

he was very good at battle strategies and tricking his opponent.


What were William the Conqueror's weakness?

he was very good at battle strategies and tricking his opponent.


Who would win in a war with calvary Alexander the great or William the conqueror?

William the conquerer would win because he had better weapons and armor. Also he had tons of archers while Alexander the Great only had a good infantry.


How was William the conqueror successful?

By right of conquest: After the death of Edward the confessor, there were 3 candidates for king : Harold II, Harald Hardrada and William the conqueror. As Harold was Edward's brother-in-law, he became king. William and Harald were annoyed. They both set about gathering there own armies. Harald arrived first in the north. He was beaten by Harold. But while this was happening William arrived in the south, Hastings to be exact. By the time Harold's troops reached Hastings, his army was weak. They were fighting a losing battle. They retreated up the hill and Harold was killed. William became king on Christmas day.


Why was William the Conqueror a bad king?

In my opinion i don't think William Was a bad king he was actually quite good hoped this helped :D


Why was king william the conqueror bad?

In my opinion i don't think William Was a bad king he was actually quite good hoped this helped :D