0
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
What else can I help you with?
Why would a landowner rather use slavery than indentured servants?
A landowner may prefer slavery over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and were permanent, with no expiration date on their service, whereas indentured servants typically had contracts lasting for set periods of time. Slaves also did not have legal rights or the ability to negotiate terms of their labor, providing landowners with more control and stability.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?
A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
Why would a landowner rather use instead of indentured servants?
A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.
Why would landowners use slaves then indentured servants?
Landowners used slaves because they provided a lifetime of labor with minimal upfront costs, while indentured servants had set terms of service and eventually gained their freedom. Slaves were seen as a long-term investment, while indentured servants were a temporary labor solution. Additionally, slaves were often considered property, providing greater control and power to the landowner.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slavery than indentured servants?
A landowner may prefer slavery over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and were permanent, with no expiration date on their service, whereas indentured servants typically had contracts lasting for set periods of time. Slaves also did not have legal rights or the ability to negotiate terms of their labor, providing landowners with more control and stability.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?
A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.
Why would a land owner rather use then indentured slaves?
more years of labor
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
Why would lawmakers rather use slaves than indentured servant?
suck dic c=======:
Why would a landowner rather use instead of indentured servants?
A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.
Why would landowners use slaves then indentured servants?
Landowners used slaves because they provided a lifetime of labor with minimal upfront costs, while indentured servants had set terms of service and eventually gained their freedom. Slaves were seen as a long-term investment, while indentured servants were a temporary labor solution. Additionally, slaves were often considered property, providing greater control and power to the landowner.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?
Slaves were property and they were owned by the plantation owners. All slaves were African Americans and could be identified as slaves. Indentured servants were white people that was working off a 7 year contract. If they wanted they could break the contract and fade into the population.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured slaves?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
