0
A landowner may prefer slavery over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and were permanent, with no expiration date on their service, whereas indentured servants typically had contracts lasting for set periods of time. Slaves also did not have legal rights or the ability to negotiate terms of their labor, providing landowners with more control and stability.
What else can I help you with?
Why would a landowner rather use instead of indentured servants?
A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?
A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than than indentured?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?
Slaves were property and they were owned by the plantation owners. All slaves were African Americans and could be identified as slaves. Indentured servants were white people that was working off a 7 year contract. If they wanted they could break the contract and fade into the population.
Why would a landowner rather use instead of indentured servants?
A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants.?
Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indetured servants?
A landowner may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and potentially more cost-effective labor source compared to indentured servants who were only bound for a fixed period. Slaves were also seen as having less legal rights and were less likely to challenge their owners, giving landowners more control over their workforce.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Why would owners of large plantations rather slaves than indentured servants?
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
What of these reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather than indentured servants?
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property, providing a long-term source of labor with no freedom or rights. Slaves could be inherited and their children born into slavery, ensuring a continuous workforce. In contrast, indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for plantation owners.
Why did colonial masters first adopt the institution of indentured servitude rather than Indian or black slavery?
Early on, there was a steady stream of white, indentured servants coming from England to the New World. Many were promised land after completing their services and were therefore eager to work. The main reason colonial masters opted for this option was because these indentured servants were much cheaper than African and Indian slaves. After Bacon's rebellion however, and after an economic upturn in England which kept laborers home, indentured servants became a less desirable option. At this point, the slave trade had opened up and indentured servants were seen as too difficult to control.
Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves that indentured servants?
Owners of large plantations preferred slaves over indentured servants primarily because slaves represented a permanent labor force, while indentured servants had a limited term of service, typically lasting four to seven years. Slavery ensured a lifetime of labor without the obligation to provide land or compensation after the term ended. Additionally, slaves could be inherited, creating a lasting asset for plantation owners, whereas indentured servants were free to leave and pursue their own opportunities once their contracts expired. This made slavery a more economically advantageous system for sustaining large-scale agricultural operations.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than than indentured?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
