Some potential benefits of cloning humans, animals, plants, etc. would be cloning needed body parts for sick people, cloning important people, cloning missed, loved ones, etc.
cloning must be prohibited ,because it is against god powers and also is harmful to human nature
therapeutic cloning
Embryo cloning is when you go through the process of cloning an original embryo
theoretically, cloning is the same.
more dogs
Replacement cloning is a theoretical possibility, and would be a combination of therapeutic and reproductive cloning. Replacement cloning would entail the replacement of an extensively damaged, failed, or failing body through cloning followed by whole or partial brain transplant.
The impact of cloning organisms in America is unknown and there is no way to predict what kind of advantages and/or disadvantages there would be as a result of cloning.
Some potential benefits of cloning humans, animals, plants, etc. would be cloning needed body parts for sick people, cloning important people, cloning missed, loved ones, etc.
Cloning, to me, is making a total duplicate of someone's body. But with no spirit put there by God, then it would be without a mind, will or emotion.
Make lots of copies of the gene rapidly.
I do not believe that anyone in the world has their own cloning cabbage, so the question makes no sense!
I believe cloning should be done, it would help the world a lot more. Also I wouldnt have to do as much for myself, because I would have a clone!
Nothing. Or maybe the large controversy over cloning.
cloning must be prohibited ,because it is against god powers and also is harmful to human nature
It would depend on what the Venn diagram was about.
No, Cloning is an expensive means of reproduction. It would be much cheaper and easier to breed cannon fodder by the old fashion means.