Want this question answered?
It replaced gathering. Instead of finding food, people found it more beneficial to grow food, that way they would have a greater chance of surviving. Instead, gatherers starved to death because of the lack of food nature provided.
Technically cooking falls under the secondary sector activities; primary sector would be farming and gathering (production), secondary secondary would be cooking (industry), while the tertiary sector would be the restaurant personnel (services).
Farming affects the economy is an extremely large way. Without farming the economy would collapse because food is a thing that humans will always need and buy.
Simple there would be no food and all of us would have to hunt and gather to eat.
Protectionism is beneficial to a country because it protects a country's resources. It allows a country's resources to be used only for the benefit of the country's people.
It replaced gathering. Instead of finding food, people found it more beneficial to grow food, that way they would have a greater chance of surviving. Instead, gatherers starved to death because of the lack of food nature provided.
Gathering supports a nomadic lifestyle; gathers use only what is available in their environment, and once a resource is exhausted, they move to another area. Farming requires semi-permanent or permanent settlement of the culture. Instead of constantly moving form area, a farming community would stay in one area all year round and cultivate the crops they needed. The concept of farming, and staying in one area, allowed for the basic foundations of society to form and has allowed humans to advance to where they are now.
Technically cooking falls under the secondary sector activities; primary sector would be farming and gathering (production), secondary secondary would be cooking (industry), while the tertiary sector would be the restaurant personnel (services).
Well, there is a book by Kelley Armstrong named "The Gathering". And that would be the only "Gathering" I know of.
Traditional farming and modern farming both have their own advantages and disadvantages. Traditional farming is often more sustainable and environmentally friendly, while modern farming tends to be more efficient and productive. The choice between the two depends on various factors such as location, scale of operation, and available resources.
A complimentary profession to skinning would be leatherworking. This way you can make armor from the skins that you collect with skinning. Of course you could choose to take another gathering profession and have a dual gatherer. This would be beneficial in that you gather resources for you other toons professions.
Gathering people in one place, would not solve our food problem. I saw her on the hill, gathering flowers in a basket.
The opposite of farming (agriculture) would be hunting or foraging.
A convocation is a gathering of people called upon for a specific purpose such as a meeting or graduation. A group of students gathering for their graduation would be considered a convocation. Another example would be the gathering of people to a church for a sermon.
Yes, the Jumanos were primarily hunter-gatherers who also practiced some small-scale farming. They cultivated crops such as maize, beans, and squash. Hunting and gathering were their main sources of food, but farming was also part of their lifestyle.
The Algonquin acquired foodstuffs by a variety of methods. As concerns horticulture, Algonquins both engaged in farming and gathering of berries and grains. As concerns animals, the Algonquin fished and trapped meats. They had no domestic animals which they would eat on a regular basis.
it would be salons