Well the biggest problem i can see with this is actually getting to mars in the first place. Once you are on mars you would just return the way you got there.
We have never been to Mars beyond sending remote rovers.
because there is no water and air presence so if we will go there we will die
At the moment, there is no return ticket on a trip to Mars!
Currently we have no way to go there and come back; OR to set up a sustainable colony.
The problem is largely logistical. Solutions have, for the most part, been worked out on paper,but the problem is only half getting a manned crew there - the other half is getting them back (it takes six months each way). The expense would be, by several orders of magnitude, beyond anything NASA has ever attempted. This answer just hits the high points of "why it hasn't been done yet" - there are many more reasons.
Yes mars is solid and not made of some gasses. The only problem is to get your materials to mars and building it.
There are many reasons such as how to get it there and the main problem is the pressure of the air on mars, if it did land then the lense would crack within seconds and a cracked microscope is no good
i would take an astranant to mars
Look at Mars through the telescope, pick a spot on the planet you can remember, check back later, find the spot again, it rotated!
the problem is getting home
If you could live on mars (space suits) you would see volcanoes and a very desert like planet. Probably you would find no sign of life. The problem with traveling to mars is that we do not have enough food on board the space shuttle because it takes 3 years to get to mars. Also your bones start to dissolve because they are not needed in space which is also a problem scientist are also currently working on
getting eaten by aliens or getting burnt alive seeing as Mars is extremely hot, too hot to farm on anyway!
totally Taylor swift we are never ever getting back together!
The problem is largely logistical. Solutions have, for the most part, been worked out on paper,but the problem is only half getting a manned crew there - the other half is getting them back (it takes six months each way). The expense would be, by several orders of magnitude, beyond anything NASA has ever attempted. This answer just hits the high points of "why it hasn't been done yet" - there are many more reasons.
Phobias is closest to mars
254 days (approx.) to get to Mars, but a bit faster coming back to Earth as a spacecraft would be travelling into the gravitational pull of the Sun
I don't think Mars has a problem at all. It is just we Earthlings that have the problem. We want to go to Mars, explore it, and possibly colonize it, but it's too far away, too cold, and too inhospitable.
1,000,0000 miles an hour
Yes mars is solid and not made of some gasses. The only problem is to get your materials to mars and building it.
Yes. While we can land things on Mars we currently do not have the ability of getting them off of Mars.
It would take 6 to 8 months just to get there! So, in total, it would probably take a little over a year, there and back!