0
Why would it help the empire to have only a few rulers who ruled for long periods of time?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why would many rulers try to bring back the Roman Empire?
they had a big civilization
What empire defeated the Egyptian empire?
The Civilization that defeated Egypt, was the Persian Empire or also known as the Achaemenid Empire. The Persian Empire defeated the Egyptians while Cyrus The Greats Son (Cambyses II) was reigning over the Empire. The Egyptians didn't even bother to try and stop the Persian Empire as they we sick of their previous ruler. So I think the answer you are looking for is the Achaemenid Empire. Although they did capture Egypt, after the Persian Empire finished, all of the empire broke up into lots of different countries, as this was when the Persian Empire Fell.Hopefully This Helped.
Which group is was more successful in ruling rome kingsemperorsor roman republic?
It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.
What type of government did Alexander the great have?
Absolute monarchy. He was a king in fact as well as name. His word literally was the law. For practical reasons he adopted much of the administrative methods of the Persians, and relied on loyal followers to serve as rulers of different parts of his empire. But they remained in power at his sufferance. Once Alexander died, they would end up carving his Empire into competing nations.oligarchy. his kingdom was ruled by a king. himself.
Would a cruel emperor rule over liberated people?
If people are liberated, they are not being ruled over by anyone.
What is an empire called that has many rulers?
There is not really a name for that, unless you would count members of Parliament/Congress as 'rulers' too. In that case, such an empire would be called a democracy.
Why would many rulers try to bring back the Roman Empire?
they had a big civilization
What empire defeated the Egyptian empire?
The Civilization that defeated Egypt, was the Persian Empire or also known as the Achaemenid Empire. The Persian Empire defeated the Egyptians while Cyrus The Greats Son (Cambyses II) was reigning over the Empire. The Egyptians didn't even bother to try and stop the Persian Empire as they we sick of their previous ruler. So I think the answer you are looking for is the Achaemenid Empire. Although they did capture Egypt, after the Persian Empire finished, all of the empire broke up into lots of different countries, as this was when the Persian Empire Fell.Hopefully This Helped.
Which group is was more successful in ruling rome kingsemperorsor roman republic?
It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.It would have to be the emperors who were more successful in ruling Rome. The kings were overthrown; the republic was clannish and corrupt. When the principate (emperors) was formed it ruled the longest and ruled the empire at its greatest extend.
What is the difference between a dynasty and a monarchy?
An Empire is a group of states or territories or ethnic groups under a single ruling power. Eg;Roman empire,Mauryan empire,Persian empire. A Dynasty means a succession or series of rulers of the same family,where the power and title is passed from generation to generation. Eg:Mughal dynasty.
Would a kingdom or empire have a larger population?
An Empire is usually a large number of kingdoms ruled over by one conquering kingdom or nation, and therefore an empire would usually have a much larger population
What happened to these aspects of Egyptian culture when Kush regained its independence?
Answer it for me
How ruled east of Rome and west of Rome?
During the later periods of the Roman Empire, there was one "ruler" or emperor of the western half and one emperor of the eastern half. The eastern half would later be referred to as the Byzantine Empire. The original ruler of the eastern Rome, and the man who introduced the split was Diocletian. His western counter part was Maximian.
What are the three modern countries that would exist in the roman territory?
There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.There are many more than three modern countries that would have existed in the territory ruled by the Roman empire. The "big three" are Italy, France and Spain, but countries from the mid east to the Atlantic and from North Africa to Scotland were all ruled by Rome.
Has the US ever been in a empire?
An empire is defend as A political unit having an extensive territory or comprising a number of territories or nations and ruled by a single supreme authority... The US is Ruled by three (3) equal authorities which can be removed by its people ... So i would have to say NO...
How do you spell rulers in Spanish?
Wooden rulers would be "reglas." Governing rulers would be "gobernantes" (governors).
What were the main periods of french history?
the main periods of french history were that it was part of a region known as gaul. the Romans established a latin-based language that developed into french.Charlemagne was the franks' greatest ruler, he dreamed of building a christian empire that would be as great as the old empire.
