The two sports I know of regarding this question are the Redskins in the NFL and the Cleveland Indians in major league Baseball. I have noticed that colleges and universities seem to be OK on this matter. St John's University changed from the RedMen to Redstorm.
There are a few reasons why sports teams might choose not to drop Native American names. Some argue that these names are part of the team's history and tradition. Others believe that using these names honors Native American culture and serves as a form of representation. However, it is important to note that many Native American communities and individuals find these names offensive and disrespectful, calling for their removal. The reasons for retaining Native American names in sports are often rooted in ignorance or resistance to change.
Not all Native Americans are against all mascots or logos. What they are against are derogatory depictions, behaviors and names that are insulting to the First Peoples. The Washington Redskins is a prime example of a perpetual insult to the Indian. The word Redskins is highly offensive to begin with. When fans let out ridiculous war whoops that offends. There are many many other things teams can have as names and mascots.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/teams ... It's a list of all College Teams of all divisions
30 teams
Detroit RED Wings
The NABI tournament had many Native American teams so we can't say who all started on each team Keep asking questions thank you :)
Because native americans were alive when these teams were created.
it would be offending
This dream seems to involve some sort of word-play, possibly reflecting the names or mascots of popular sports teams. This is especially likely at this time (summer, 2014) when there is media attention of the controversy over the implied racism in professional sports teams' use of Native American and First Peoples' names and images.
The general sentiment of Native Americans is that they should not be used. The reasons will vary widely, but are expressed by some (at least) in derogatory statements of non-indian examples (not reproduced here as they are inflammatory.)
yes
about 456.3 sport teams use Indian names
giniconitids
ABSOLUTELY NOT! That's totally racist. After all the things that whites have done to Native Americans why do they try to "honor" them with football teams and business names? Only name the business after a Native American chief if the business supports Native Americans.
cowboys
Not all Native Americans are against all mascots or logos. What they are against are derogatory depictions, behaviors and names that are insulting to the First Peoples. The Washington Redskins is a prime example of a perpetual insult to the Indian. The word Redskins is highly offensive to begin with. When fans let out ridiculous war whoops that offends. There are many many other things teams can have as names and mascots.
Indian logos and mascots are not showing insensitivity to American Indians, some warrior type actions may be misinterpreted, but teams having Indian names are not being disrespectful.
Bears, Cubs, Blackhawks, Bulls, and White Sox