Want this question answered?
The amount of CFC in atmosphere in 2000 was less. It was because Montreal Protocol had been started.
They consume the plants (producers) and obtain the most amount of nutrients and energy and then get eaten by the secondary consumers who obtain a little less energy since it is being passed down a line. Cows would be a primary who consumers grass that obtained energy and nutrients through photosynthesis and then we eat the cow (secondary) and gain what was left from the grass after the cow ate it and spent energy
If a plant lost a significant amount of its chlorophyll, than it couldn't produce as much food for itself as before. Therefor, the plant would have less food it could use in respiration, and thus respiration would decrease. With less respiration, the plant would have less energy, and if the amount of chlorophyll loss was too high, the plant would die.
No. Less ozone would cause less depletion, if that were the case. We have less ozone each year, and the rate of depletion does not correlate with the amount we have. See the related questions section below.
once the molecules evaporates or boils that there would be less of an amount of the component in the solution.
British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.British tourists would have the largest amount, but it would be less than 60%.
Our air quality would improve. Also, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air would be reduced.
The amount of CFC in atmosphere in 2000 was less. It was because Montreal Protocol had been started.
I dont know. ask them only. LOL
if people started using less gas and started biking we could be rid of global warming in something like 27 years or something
Leaves are narrow ovals so less moisture is lost when there is dry air. Large roots to obtain maximum amount of water from the ground. Sheds leaves in dry season so that less moisture is lost.
same as the other plants obtain,this is meaning less question>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If the company started out with negative Retained Earnings, the ending balance would be less than their Net Income. Or, if the company paid out a large amount in Dividends.
The less command can be used to scroll through a large amount of text that would otherwise move off the screen.
Your question is very unclear, but the gravity of the Moon is 1/6 the amount of Earth's gravity. So, you would way 1/6 the amount on the Moon. You would way less on the Moon.
Typically, percentage wise against the GDP, the amount would be less. But the total amount vs. other countries tends to be more.
The amount of rainfall in much less.