Because, it is too small to see with the naked eye.
Because, it is too small to see with the naked eye.
Because these organisms are too smaller to be observed directly.
Because, it is too small to see with the naked eye.
we need microscope to see unicellular organism because they are very small
Yes. One celled or unicellular organisms are so small you would need a strong microscope to see one.
Organism that have one cell (single celled) are so small, you would need a microscope to see them. So, orchids are multicellular.
Bacteria are generally very small - so you would need an electron microscope to see them in any detail. Under a light microscope you would probably only be able to see the overall shape.
what instrument was necessary for the development of the cell theory? you would need cells. you can't have the organism without cells. you can't have a school without people. so the answer is cells.
because the prokaryote organism is way to small to see without a microscope
Because these organisms are too smaller to be observed directly.
we need microscope to see unicellular organism because they are very small
Because, it is too small to see with the naked eye.
Micro organism
Liquids and gases expand inside a vacuum, so the organism's shape would be destroyed..
If you need a microscope to see a human then yes, otherwise no.
Yes. One celled or unicellular organisms are so small you would need a strong microscope to see one.
Organism that have one cell (single celled) are so small, you would need a microscope to see them. So, orchids are multicellular.
Bacteria are generally very small - so you would need an electron microscope to see them in any detail. Under a light microscope you would probably only be able to see the overall shape.
HIV is too small to see with a light microscope. You will need an electron microscope.
i think you would need an electron microscope because the approximate size of a ribosome is 0.00000001m