Through several experiments and tests, it's quite evident that Global Warming is happening. The sea level is rising, the temperature is rising, the percentage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has GREATLY increased, and the ice caps are melting. Everything is pointing to disaster, and that disaster is Global Warming.
A:I respect the scientific opinion on this. Most climate scientists say that there is no doubt that global warming is happening and that we are contributing to that change.
We could keep on burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas). The air would be full of pollution and dust. As coal and oil eventually run out we will be desperately trying to dig up and mine even our most beautiful National Parks and Heritages. We will be digging into Antarctica looking for oil. All our forests will have gone, destroyed to make paper and boxes, or burnt to keep us warm.
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
Yourself! Ask yourself is global warming an actual global happening or is it just bandwagon jumping by the liberal wishywashy brigade who cant seem to fathom that the planet is millions of years old and goes through varying weather cycles? Fud
The opposite would be global cooling.
It depends. If you are a crazy, confused person then you would probably think it's really good. If you are like me, then you would think it's bad.
Scientists would be relieved if they had not been able to prove that global warming is happening. They could move on and investigate more fruitful areas of science, feeling that at least this is one problem they do not have to worry about. It is because scientists have proven that global warming is happening that they are concerned.
People are free to choose whether to believe that global warming is real, and no one says that they must believe the scientific evidence for global warming. However, those who wish to be informed would note that there is a strong scientific consensus that this is the case. Also, people who accept the reality that global warming is happening are the people who will be able to provide the leadership needed to solve the problem.
If you were asked to speak in a debate, "Against man-made Global Warming" you would be arguing that man is not causing Global Warming. You would have to argue that Global Warming is occurring naturally.
no.the global warming won't benefit anyone
We could keep on burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas). The air would be full of pollution and dust. As coal and oil eventually run out we will be desperately trying to dig up and mine even our most beautiful National Parks and Heritages. We will be digging into Antarctica looking for oil. All our forests will have gone, destroyed to make paper and boxes, or burnt to keep us warm.
It is important to know about and understand global warming so that we can understand the important decisions political leaders are making to abate global warming. Unless we really understand what is happening and the risks involved in allowing global warming to continue, we risk being misled by those with vested interests, who would have us believe either that global warming is not real or that it is real but there is nothing we can do. If we know about global warming, we also understand what we can do to help. We will understand that everything we do to reduce our electricity consumption will help, and we will understand that reducing our petrol or gasoline consumption is another way to help.
If global warming affects the ozone hole, the UV will come in. This will lead to more global warming.
No. Global warming is caused by man burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. No other animal does that. If there were no humans on earth, there would be no global warming.
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
Yourself! Ask yourself is global warming an actual global happening or is it just bandwagon jumping by the liberal wishywashy brigade who cant seem to fathom that the planet is millions of years old and goes through varying weather cycles? Fud
The opposite would be global cooling.
No one would want to have global warming being caused by humans. That is not a logical position for anyone. Zero percent would WANT man induced global warming.