At most they would get you something to calm you down my guess is. It depends on the hospital. It can be uncomfortable but not painful and you get a numbing gel before hand. The pain from not being able to pee and you have a full bladder is 100 times worse. Sedating someone is a much bigger thing and risky. I have never seen a patient being in pain when I gave him a catheter and I worked with it for over 2 years.
I cannot say for sure but would guess that if the er physician feels the catheterization to be necessary and the patient absolutely will not consent any other way, that they would provide the requested sedation in order to get the catheterization accomplished.
Yes if it's an emergency they can not wait for parental consent.
Absolutely not.
ABSOLUTELY. It could possibly save your life.
The age of consent in Louisiana is 17 years old. Whether a parent consents or not means absolutely nothing.
Absolutely not!
absolutely not
Absolutely not! but this your life and this website can't controll it. your call. Absolutely not! but this your life and this website can't controll it. your call.
In most cases, emergency treatment will be given without consent. Routine items will not be done without parental consent. Someone has to agree to make the necessary payments.
Answer for England and Wales: Absolutely not.
Without parental consent? Absolutely not. With parental consent? Well, parents can give their child permission to live somewhere other than home if it
Yes this is legal in all states.
An example of an implied limited contract would be a physician providing emergency medical care at the site of an accident. Because of the emergency, the consent would be implied, but would end once the patient entered a more formal agreement with emergency personnel or an emergency room at a hospital.