Generally, the military doesn't hold you "legally" accountable; however, the act of your dependent reflects, both, on you and your branch of service.
The military is likely to administer administrative punishment. If such conduct continues in the future, the military is capable of discharging the service member for the act of the dependent.
"He who permits evil commits evil" basically means that a bystander is just as responsible as someone who actually commits a crime. It's hard to argue that a bystander is exactly as responsible, but if people do not speak up against crime, then they are allowing these crimes to be commited.
Any soldier who commits a military crime is court-martialled, i.e. tried by a military court.
Any soldier who commits a military crime is court-martialled, i.e. tried by a military court.
Saving a life creates a moral obligation to ensure the well-being of that individual. While you may not be responsible for all aspects of their life, there is a sense of duty to offer support and assistance as needed. This responsibility varies depending on the context of the situation.
If a member of the military commits a crime, they will be court-martialed. This means they must go to a special military court to have a trial instead of a civilian court. The entire trial will then be conducted by the military itself.
Commits- like: she commits a crime.
George Wilson commits suicide in the great gatsby.
Your question is very peculiar; since you specify that the person who committed the violations wasn't caught, there should be no tickets to be paid. In any event, it is the person who commits a traffic violation who is responsible for any resulting fines, even if that person is not the owner of the vehicle.
Claudius commits no crime in Act III. He is, however, forced to consider his previous crime of murdering his brother.
military tribunal !!!!
They are not responsible for the crime of a 20 year old person no matter where the person lives, unless they somehow helped commit the crime in some way.
The gang member because even though "the gang" has policies/rules/regulations so to speak the member is ultimately responsible for his or her own actions.