Want this question answered?
It is an example for a combustion reaction. The matchstick contains sulfur and carbon. Therefore two of the products would be sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide.
It kills yeast. If you didn't do that, the wine would turn to vinegar.
Composition stoichiometry
Lava is actually just rock in its liquid form - it's not sulfur. If it were, you would know it because at the temperature of lava, it burns and produces the nasty-smelling gas sulfur dioxide. You'll start gagging and coughing from the smell when you get anywhere near a molten-sulfur flow.
The sulfur content of coal and its heating values are not constant across all grades of coal. It would require information of type of coal, carbon content, sulfur content and ash content to even start the calculation.
Sulfur dioxide.
Basically, sulfur dioxide is a acidic gas. As acid reacts with alkali, carbonates and metals, all 3 are actually ideal to remove sulfur dioxide. However, in the context of removing sulfur dioxide due to air pollution, reacting sulfur dioxide with alkali and carbonate would be more appropriate. For example, removing sulfur dioxide with calcium carbonate would result in calcium sulfate, water and carbon dioxide.
Four moles of sulfur dioxide would consist of how many molecules?
It is an example for a combustion reaction. The matchstick contains sulfur and carbon. Therefore two of the products would be sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide.
Sulfur Dioxide
Liquid chlorine oxidizes everything in water including sulfur dioxide. Sulfur dioxide has that rotten egg smell
Sulphate
No - it is not really needed. Molasses (unrefined sugar) is a preservative in its own right. If you were to use an extra, it would tend to be sodium metabisulfite which admittedly is a source of Sulfur dioxide.
it is a combustion. the word equation would be: sulfur + oxygen → sulfur dioxide the balanced chemical equation: S(s) + O₂(g) → SO₂(g)
You would use a correlation spectrometer.
It wouldn't change at all as it is neutral
correlation spectrometer