No, Gandhi used the the high moral ground and the freedom of the press to achieve his goals. Had he used violence he would have been portrayed merely as another rebel.
Gandhi brought peace in india by using non-violence.
Do it Gandhi style and talk it out!
win a war without using violence
Mahatma gandhi
1. using violence to obtain independance
Mahatma Gandhi influenced many people to start believing in Non-violence and push the British Laws using words and Non-violence.PeaceAn ipad
? I don't quite understand the question. Perhaps you are asking whether Gandhi would support the delegation of force and violence instead of the direct application of violence. I think he would have stood opposed to it. If I want something for myself or for something else and decided instead of using force to get it that I would delegate that force out it is just as morally wrong as if I had committed the force myself. Instead of delegating force to government Gandhi would have sought peaceful solutions to the world's problems.
The Salt MarchSatyagraha, which means "Soul-Force" or "The power of truth"Ahimsa, non-violence
gandhi used the rule of ahisma to protest that mean he used non-violence in all of his protests
He believed in Ahimsa, non violence (including animals) Satyagraha - holding onto their truth aim to get the opposition to see the truth without using violence
He wanted Non violence and wanted everyone to be treated equally
he starved himself instead of using violence but someselfish person shot him dead