answersLogoWhite

0

Jupiter would be but not for a long time, because it costs lots of money, we still need technology to advance for it. It is an interesting place to go though. It has a very weird moon called Io and a moon called Europa that could harbor life! We would also go there to study its gigantic red storm and to do lots of experiments. We definitely wont live there for at least 70 years.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Would Neptune make a good location for a manned mission to colonize the planet?

We can't colonize it because we can't land on it.


What is a manned lunar mission?

A manned lunar mission is a space mission in which astronauts travel to and land on the Moon. The astronauts conduct scientific research, collect samples, and perform experiments while on the lunar surface before returning safely to Earth. The Apollo missions in the 1960s and 1970s are examples of manned lunar missions.


What would be required for a manned mission to mars?

Training,faster space craft,heat shields


Will human be able to land on Jupiter?

It is highly unlikely that humans will be able to land on Jupiter in the near future due to the extreme conditions on the planet, such as its lack of a solid surface, intense radiation, and crushing atmospheric pressure. Additionally, the distance and travel time to Jupiter make a manned mission logistically challenging and risky.


Have any mission visited Jupiter?

No because if a mission would land there you would instantly die because it is a gas planet.


When was the last manned moon mission how long did it take?

That would be Alan B. Shepard, who was also the first American in space.


Has anybody ever tried to go to Jupiter?

In real life to date, we have only sent probes past Jupiter. In fiction, perhaps the most famous instances of manned missions to Jupiter are found in the novels of the late Arthur C. Clarke (2001: A Space Odyssey, and their sequels).


What would be a good thesis statement of a research essay titled Is it worth the risk and expense to attempt a manned mission to Mars?

A good thesis statement for a research essay titled, "Is it worth the risk and expense to attempt a manned mission to Mars", could be, "The knowledge and strategic advantage of a manned mission to Mars far outweighs the cost and risks".


Where was the Apollo 1 going to land?

Apollo 1 was not actually scheduled to even travel to the moon, let alone land. Had the mission actually gone off, it would have fulfilled essentially the same mission later accomplished my Apollo 7 (the first manned mission using Apollo equipment). Apollo 7 was an 11-day Earth-orbital mission, the first manned launch of the Saturn IB launch vehicle, and the first three-person US space mission. This would have been the mission of Apollo 1.


Is it possible in the near future to visit Jupiter?

As one of my physics teacher once told me anything is possible in the future. However, Jupiter is a gas planet, therefore a manned mission to Jupiter would not be able to land on the surface. The futuristic spacecraft used on this mission would need to be in orbit or fly in Jupiter's thick atmosphere. Another scenario would be a mission to land on one of Jupiter's moons. However the trip itself could have some devastating effects on the crew. For one the trip will most likely take a couple of years just to get to the gas giant, the psychological effects of leaving your family behind for a long period of time (5 years or more) and not being able to distinguish planet Earth from the millions of stars in the sky could end in depression, mental problems, suicide... Second, Jupiter's magnetic field is incredibly strong, and could have grave consequences on the astronauts body. A trip to Jupiter in the future could be possible but many hurtles must first be cleared before we could embark on such a voyage.


How much would it cost to go mars?

Estimates vary. Several tens of billions at the most conservative. We do not have the technology at present for a manned mission to Mars.


Why would NASA think of using Concordia to do research for planning a manned mission to mars?

NASA may consider using Concordia Station in Antarctica for research related to a manned mission to Mars due to its extreme and isolated environment, which closely simulates the conditions of long-duration space missions. The station provides a unique opportunity to study human behavior, health, and teamwork under isolation and confinement, which are critical factors for the success of a Mars mission. Additionally, the logistical challenges of living and working in such a remote location can inform strategies for resource management and sustainability on Mars.