Mexico would not conquer Bosnia, but it would probably beat it in a war.
Believe it or not, Mexico has a pretty large army, with more than 300 thousand troops.
Bosnia has barely over 11 thousand, so the Mexican armed forces outnumber the Bosnian armed forces 27 to 1.
Also, Mexico is the 14th largest economy in the world, while Bosnia is the 104th one. The budget for the Mexican army is much larger and the equipment is also better, since it imports a lot of American and Russian weaponry while Bosnia still uses a lot of old, Yugoslavia era equipment.
So, based on these facts and not including other things like the fact that the US would most likely be on Mexico's side or that Mexican special forces train with the US, etc, it's safe to assume that, while Mexico wouldn't be able to conquer Bosnia, it would be victorious in the unlikely event that an armed conflict happened between these two countries.
when mexico pooped on the us territory
No war in Bosnia is finish 1995
Bosnia did win the war, along with Croatia. The Bosnian army was 20 km infront of the Capital city of Banja Luka. If the war would have continued, the ''Republic of Serbia'' would no longer exist. ''Operation Storm, 1995''
no Britain did not declare war on bosnia. Austria-Hungary did
There are no war conflicts in Bosnia since 1996.
Well the most famous war with Mexico was to get the land of what is now Texas. So if we didn't have that war with Mexico there would be no Texas.
Which war are you referring to?
No, the U.S. did not conquer Canada in the War of 1812.
The Bosnian genocide took place in Bosnia.
Yes, because the Seize of Sarajevo was a part of the Bosnian War. The Bosnia War was apart of the Yugoslav Wars. So, Sarajevo is a place of war in the Bosnia War.
The war in Bosnia left around 400,000 people dead.
The Coptic Church is located in Bosnia. It was build in Bosnia after the second world war. It was a symbol of hope for all the people in Bosnia at that time who were still recovering from the damage done to them because of the war.