Yes; it would be infringing even if it weren't used to get paying gigs.
To use someone else's content in a video project, you need a synchronization license.
Copying, altering, distributing, or performing/displaying the file without permission from the copyright holder or an exemption in the law would be considered infringement.
Yes; it would be considered creating a derivative work, which is one of the exclusive rights of the copyright holder.
No; this would be considered public performance, which requires a license.
For most uses, yes; a license would be required. There are limited educational uses that may be considered fair.
Yes, unless you have their permission to record a live musical performance, it would be a copyright infringement. Similarly, if they do not have permission to perform and record their rendition of a copyrighted composition, your recording of their performance would be a copyright violation and uploading it anywhere would be a further violation (unauthorized publication of an unauthorized recording).
That would be copyright infringement if the original song was protected.
No. That would be CopyRight Infringement
Innocent infringement is a violation of copyright without willful intent. Accidentally moving an mp3 onto a shared drive would be innocent infringement.
You would be guilty of copyright infringement, a federal crime.
I wouldn't think that would qualify as copyright infringement because aren't his poems under public domain?
The picture itself is protected by copyright; downloading it without permission would be copyright infringement.
Using a logo without permission would be trademarkinfringement.