Could be considered one. Depends on how much reconstruction/remodeling has been done on it. If you visit a 13th century castle you would see how it is made, laid out, and may get an understanding of how people lived, so it would be a primary source.
With regard to history, a primary source would be considered as such if they were eye witnesses to an event, such as the Siege of Jereusalem.
The internet can be a primary source if the information comes directly from an original or firsthand account or data. For example, a research study published on a reputable website would be considered a primary source. However, if the information is a secondary source, such as a news article summarizing a study, then it would not be considered a primary source.
A contemporary scholar's discussion of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address would not be considered a primary source, but a secondary source. It may still be a valid source of information, however.
No, a primary source is an original document or an actual witness.
director
Yes, because it was taken at the time it happened.
t
A newspaper article published in 2008 reporting on an event that occurred at that time would be considered a primary source.
No, it would be a secondary source. A primary source is written by someone who was there when it happened. If the author happened to participate or witness a Spanish mission, then it would be a primary source. Secondary sources are based off things that people learn from a primary source or a different secondary source.
Yes. Primary sources are first-hand evidence supporting a topic. Therefore, a map that directly shows evidence towards what you are stating or researching would be considered a primary source. Good luck!
Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.
i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there