answersLogoWhite

0

Could be considered one. Depends on how much reconstruction/remodeling has been done on it. If you visit a 13th century castle you would see how it is made, laid out, and may get an understanding of how people lived, so it would be a primary source.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who is a primary source?

With regard to history, a primary source would be considered as such if they were eye witnesses to an event, such as the Siege of Jereusalem.


Is internet a primary source?

The internet can be a primary source if the information comes directly from an original or firsthand account or data. For example, a research study published on a reputable website would be considered a primary source. However, if the information is a secondary source, such as a news article summarizing a study, then it would not be considered a primary source.


What would not be considered a primary source for a history term paper on Lincoln's Gettysburg Address?

A contemporary scholar's discussion of Lincoln's Gettysburg Address would not be considered a primary source, but a secondary source. It may still be a valid source of information, however.


Is a report a primary source?

No, a primary source is an original document or an actual witness.


Who or what would be considered a reliable primary source on the subject of directing a Hollywood movie?

director


Why would a photograph be considered a primary source?

Yes, because it was taken at the time it happened.


Who or what would be considered a reliable primary source on the object of directing a holly wood movie?

t


What is an example of a primary source from the year 2008?

A newspaper article published in 2008 reporting on an event that occurred at that time would be considered a primary source.


Would a book written this year about life on a Spanish mission in Florida be a primary source?

No, it would be a secondary source. A primary source is written by someone who was there when it happened. If the author happened to participate or witness a Spanish mission, then it would be a primary source. Secondary sources are based off things that people learn from a primary source or a different secondary source.


Are maps a primary source?

Yes. Primary sources are first-hand evidence supporting a topic. Therefore, a map that directly shows evidence towards what you are stating or researching would be considered a primary source. Good luck!


Would letters and diaries of soldiers always be accurate historical evidence?

Yes, because letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered what is called a primary source. A primary source is a document or artefact created at the time of the event. This means that letters and diaries of soldiers would be considered accurate historical evidence.


Is the drawing Jamestown a primary or a secondary source?

i think that it is a secondary source because it dosen't look like that person who drew it was there