0
Would a map or a globe be helpful for studying the exact shapes of continents?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
A globe would be more helpful as maps depict distorted images.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which would be least helpful to scientist trying to find evidence that earth is very old?
Examing contiental drift
What would happen if evaporation-exceeded precipitation over the continents and oceans?
there would be no ocean anymore.
What is the antonym of helpful?
Helpful is a word that describes something that is useful and gives aid. The opposite of helpful would be unhelpful, useless, destructive, damaging, worthless, or hindrance
Wegener's continental drift hypothesis was weakened because a viable mechanism for moving the continents was lacking?
Yes, they could not find a reason that would cause the movements of the continents. Now, scientists have discovered that the continents don't drift, but rather they are carried by tectonic plates.
What type of map would be most useful for studying earthquakes?
geologic maps
What would be more helpful for studying exact shapes of continents a globe or a map?
you will know the specific information in place where you go.
What would be more helpful for studying the exact shapes of continents a globe or a map?
you will know the specific information in place where you go.
Which would be more helpful for studying the exact shapes of continents a globe or a map?
A globe would be more helpful for studying the exact shapes of continents, as it provides a more accurate representation of the Earth's curved surface compared to a flat map. This is because a globe shows the continents in their true spherical form, whereas a map distorts their shapes due to the projection used to flatten the Earth onto paper.
What would be more helpful for studying the exact shape of the continents a globe or map?
you will know the specific information in place where you go.
Which would be more helpful for studying the exact shape of continents a globe or a map?
A globe because the projection on a map is always distorted.
Which would be more helpful for studying the exact shape of continents a globes or a map?
This s more of an oppinion question, though I would say a globe.
What would be the most helpful to a reader who is studying a story?
Evidence that is in the story.
What would be most helpful to a reader who is studying a story?
Evidence that is in the story.
Which choice would be most helpful to a reader who is studying a story?
Evidence that is in the story
Which would be more helpful for studing the exact shapes of continents a globe or map?
I would think the globe would be more accurate since the world isn't actually flat. If you peel off the surface of the earth and flatten it out, you will have a lot of distortion if you try to fill in the spaces created by flattening it out. Maps are fine for smaller, localized areas.
What is true about globes they show the true shapes of the continents and oceans or they are like aerial photographs?
Neither. They are usually not at all like aerial photographs since they show geopolitical features - including things like place names. You would be hard pressed to find a place name in a true aerial photograph - except perhaps for Hollywood! Also, the shapes that they show for continents and oceans are approximate rather than the true shapes.
Which would be least helpful to scientist trying to find evidence that earth is very old?
Examing contiental drift
