Yes, they could not find a reason that would cause the movements of the continents. Now, scientists have discovered that the continents don't drift, but rather they are carried by tectonic plates.
yes it does.
Glossopteris, a seed fern found in fossil records across several continents, played a crucial role in Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift. Its widespread distribution in now-separated landmasses, such as South America, Africa, Antarctica, and Australia, provided evidence that these continents were once joined. The presence of Glossopteris in these diverse locations suggested that they must have been connected in a single landmass, which Wegener named Gondwana. This fossil evidence supported his argument for the movement of continents over geological time.
no because then they would know least about the world
plate tectonics
His evidence was incorrect.
Wegener's hypothesis for continental drift, proposed in the early 20th century, suggests that continents were once part of a single supercontinent called Pangaea, which gradually broke apart and drifted to their current positions. He based his hypothesis on evidence such as the fit of continental coastlines, similar geological features across continents, and fossil correlations. Despite presenting compelling evidence, Wegener's theory was initially met with skepticism due to the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics that his ideas gained widespread acceptance.
Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was largely rejected due to a lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. He proposed that continents plowed through the oceanic crust, which seemed implausible to many scientists. Additionally, his ideas conflicted with the prevailing theories of the time, such as land bridges and static continents. The discovery of plate tectonics in the 1960s eventually provided the necessary mechanisms for continental movement, validating Wegener's ideas long after their initial rejection.
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was met with significant skepticism and resistance from many in the scientific community during his time. Critics argued that he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move, leading to widespread dismissal of his ideas. However, over time, as more evidence emerged and the theory of plate tectonics developed, Wegener's hypothesis gained acceptance and is now recognized as a foundational concept in geology.
One of the fatal weaknesses in Wegener's theory of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move through the solid rock of Earth's mantle. Additionally, Wegener was unable to adequately explain what forces could be responsible for moving the continents.
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
One weakness of Wegener's proposal of continental drift was the lack of a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's theory was not widely accepted at the time due to insufficient supporting evidence and the reluctance of the scientific community to accept such a radical idea.
While geological research during the sixties had shed new light into the theory, it was J. Tuzo Wilson's proposal of a mechanism for continental drift what led to widespread acceptance of the theory. Proposing a feasible mechanism was something Wegener himself had failed to do, he had only proposed some evidence (complementary Coastlines and fossil distributions across continents.) and falsified mechanisms (like Earth's centrifugal pseudoforce).