Want this question answered?
Probably not as it is needed to fold proteins in their correct conformation. Without properly functioning proteins, it will die.
anaerobic means without the presence of oxygen. the opposite is aerobic, which means with the presence of oxygen
Better question. What cells do not contain proteins? Proteins is from the Greek and means " first place, " so I can not think of any cell without some types of proteins.
proteins are comprised of amino acids, so it is impossible to have proteins without amino acids.
No. Our body uses proteins to heal itself, make new cells, and provide energy to our body.No proteins=Dead
Yes it is possible for someone to get sick without getting enough proteins.
Life on land may not have been possible wihtout the development of the ozone layer.
It's impossible to tell, it would probably be possible. But disulfide bonds are crucial to keeping proteins in their confirmation.
depends which one! but i think its safe to say, that most are leathal. mitochondria is the site of respiration, without it no energy -> death Golgi aparatus/endoplasmic reticulum is where certain proteins fold, without it no new/functional proteins ->no growth, possible death Nucleosome is where DNA is, without it no proteins -> see above exclusion studies have been done. Google them :P
you can't be born without proteins.
It wouldn't be able to synthesize proteins.
The refraction of light by the cornea and lens of the eye makes it possible for an image to form on the retina. Without the formation of an image, it would be possible for the retina to detect the presence or absence of light, but not shapes or objects.
Probably not as it is needed to fold proteins in their correct conformation. Without properly functioning proteins, it will die.
Proteins are not bad. Without proteins no living things would exist on the earth anywhere.
Enzymes (Are all proteins, but not all proteins are enzymes.)
Absolutely Nothing.
yes I'ld love to know if is it possible me too