0
Would an earthquake support the principle of uniformitarianism or the principle of catastrophism?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Catastrophism was the theory that the Earth had largely been shaped by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. This was in contrast to uniformitarianism (sometimes described as gradualism), in which slow incremental changes, such as erosion, created all the Earth's geological features.
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
An earthquake would support the principle of catastrophism. The principle of catastrophism suggests that significant geological events, such as earthquakes, are caused by sudden, violent forces. This is in contrast to uniformitarianism, which argues that geological processes occur gradually over long periods of time.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Would an earthquake support the principle of uniformitarianism or principle of catastrophism?
Catastrophism was the theory that the Earth had largely been shaped by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. This was in contrast to uniformitarianism (sometimes described as gradualism), in which slow incremental changes, such as erosion, created all the Earth's geological features.
How can catastrophic events be used to support Hutton's geologic principle of 'Uniformitarianism'?
First, let's define uniformitarianism. It is the postulation that the geologic principles that operated in the past are the same as those that are operating today. The opposite view is supposed to be catastrophism, the postulation that Earth's geologic features are a result of sudden and catastrophic processes that are not currently in action today. Catastrophic events, however, are perfectly compatible with uniformitarianism, as events such as flooding can occur due to normal processes such as headward erosion toward large bodies of water, and climatic caused ice melting during periods of glaciations. Large meteor impacts have been recorded in the past, and so have eruptions of supervolcanoes. These catastrophic events are going to occur again and are considered a part of, just not a highly predictable part of, the geologic cycle.
Did Canada send medical support to Haiti after the earthquake?
Yes they did send medical supplies.
If neutron strikes an atom of uranium and splits does this support Dalton's atomic theory?
The third principle of Dalton atomic theory is no supported.
Does the shape of the earthquake focus pattern support the theory of plate tectonics?
Earthquakes are most common above boundaries between the tectonic plates. If a map is taken and then earthquake patterns marked on it, the clear shapes of the tectonic plates can be seen, out lined by the earthquake markers. (the clear shapes of the tectonic plates...that's actually kind of a cool rhyme...)
Would an earthquake support the principle of uniformitarianism or principle of catastrophism?
Catastrophism was the theory that the Earth had largely been shaped by sudden, short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. This was in contrast to uniformitarianism (sometimes described as gradualism), in which slow incremental changes, such as erosion, created all the Earth's geological features.
How does the erosion of these mountains support the principle of uniformitarianism?
This help the principal because erosion is a movement that breaks rock into pieces so that what make the volcanoes more rounder
How does the erosion of mountains support the principle of uniformitarianism?
This help the principal because erosion is a movement that breaks rock into pieces so that what make the volcanoes more rounder
How can catastrophic events be used to support Hutton's geologic principle of 'Uniformitarianism'?
First, let's define uniformitarianism. It is the postulation that the geologic principles that operated in the past are the same as those that are operating today. The opposite view is supposed to be catastrophism, the postulation that Earth's geologic features are a result of sudden and catastrophic processes that are not currently in action today. Catastrophic events, however, are perfectly compatible with uniformitarianism, as events such as flooding can occur due to normal processes such as headward erosion toward large bodies of water, and climatic caused ice melting during periods of glaciations. Large meteor impacts have been recorded in the past, and so have eruptions of supervolcanoes. These catastrophic events are going to occur again and are considered a part of, just not a highly predictable part of, the geologic cycle.
How has the role of catastrophism in earth science changed?
sam was here i love the earth i support it very well in my heart sam is an idiot for not answering the question
What life does an earthquake support?
after life
Which principle did Principles of Geology support?
.
How does the preamble support the principle of popular sovereignty?
i d k
Why are aftershocks dangerous to buildings after earthquake?
it may colapse the support beams that the building have already had weakend by the actuall earthquake, causing them to fall down!
How the principle of uniformitarianism and evidence from index fossils supports the existence of Pangaea?
well cant say how uniformitarianism would support it but as far as index fossils go think about the fact that a for a single species to survive on multiple continents at same time it would need the same environment and apparently its not the case now but Pangaea was a single continent @ one place with single environment. so if any index fossils spread across multiple continents point towards them being of same environment and the most logical explanation is them being at the similar lat-long which sort of points us towards the idea that is Pangaea!
Why did Arab leaders support President Wilson's principle of self-determination?
h
What charity does oxfam support?
Oxfam collects money for calamities like floods, and earthquake.
