It's been tried. Many a hundred "universal languages" have been proposed, but the best of them, Esperanto, has had only limited success. The nearest thing to a common language is English, with more than twice as many people knowing it as a second language as those who speak it as a first.
The challenge to any national language becoming a true universal, is that it carries "baggage," associations with the politics of the mother country. People feel they need their "own" language to preserve their culture, and they're probably right.
While having one language for the whole world can facilitate global communication and understanding, it would also come with challenges. It may lead to the loss of cultural diversity and minority languages, which are important aspects of global heritage. Additionally, implementing and promoting a universal language could face practical and logistical difficulties. A balanced approach that promotes multilingualism while also encouraging language education and understanding across cultures may be more beneficial.
To say "Not so good" in Yoruba language, you would say "Ko dara ju."
Good morning in Delta language is "Obara."
"Harmonia" could be a good name for a language, as it conveys a sense of balance, unity, and coherence.
"Good Afternoon" in Manobo language is "Maayong Hapon."
The meaning of "good" in Kanuri language (Borno) is "laakwal."
We would all be 'not good'.
because if nobody peacekept then the whole world would be in chaos!!
Having one universal language for the whole world could have benefits like improved communication and understanding. However, it could also lead to the loss of cultural diversity and languages. It would require extensive effort to implement and may face resistance from those who value linguistic diversity.
The same as you would with anyone in the world. You would greet them and try to communicate with them, and if you spoke their language you could have a good conversation with them.
Assuming your first language is English then another European language would be good.
because it is an abbreviation of Lucifer and there is nothing good in him at all people are deceived as it is written the whole world lieth under the power of the evil one so they use his language the language of lies. But our conversation is in heaven
there is a lot of good games
The tool song (as any good fan would know) is called Aenima. WARNING TO THOSE WHO HAVEN'T HEARD IT: contains bad language. A lot of bad language.
The Arabic statement for good morning is ( sabah alkhaer) & is written in Arabic as : "صباح الخير" but the official greeting in the whole Islamic world is ( alsalamo aalekom) & it's written as : "السلام عليكم" i.e.( peace be upon you)
Mr.Stanley is d best in the world and he will always be remembered by the whole world
I would say it is a teacher for language.
If good people were clever and clever people were good, we might see a more harmonious society where intelligence is used for the betterment of others. This could lead to more efficient problem-solving, improved decision-making, and a focus on compassion and empathy in all areas of life. Overall, it could create a more balanced and collaborative world.