0
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter?
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter using the system call interface provided by the operating system?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes. An user should be able to develop a new command interpreter using the system-call interface provided by the operating system. The command interpreter allows an user to create and manage processes and also determine ways by which they communicate (such as through pipes and files). As all of this functionality could be accessed by an user-level program using the system calls, so it should be possible for the user to develop a new command-line interpreter.
Would it be possible for the user to develop a new command interpreter using system call interface provided by the operating system?
It reads commands from the user or from a file of commands and executes them, usually by turning them into one or more system calls. It is usually not part of the kernel since the command interpreter is subject to changes. An user should be able to develop a new command interpreter using the system-call interface provided by the operating system. The command interpreter allows an user to create and manage processes and also determine ways by which they communicate (such as through pipes and files). As all of this functionality could be accessed by an user-level program using the system calls, so it should be possible for the user to develop a new command-line interpreter.
When do you think a cultural interpreter would be more apptopriate to use a language intrepreter cultural interpreter would be moreappropriate than a language interpreter?
to have a better unde3rstanding of the patient culture and beliefs.
Is community interpreter need to ponctal?
i would like to know if a community interpreter need to be punctual?
Can breast cancer develop at 13?
that would be extremely rare, but yes it is possible.
What is the difference between interpreter and parser and compiler?
in my personal point of view i would say a parser is more like "one-directional" "automatic" vs. an interpreter, the interpreter has more "intelligence"
What is a medical interpreter?
A medical Interpreter is somebody who translates everything the doctor says to the patient who speaks a different language from the doctor. The Medical Interpreter translates because the patient would get scared or frightened because they do not understand what the doctor is saying. The patient would stay calm if they understood what the Doctor was saying.
How do you say interpreter in Spanish?
It depends on your "method of acquisition".If you are going to hire an individual or bring on an individual whose job it is to be an interpreter, you would say: "Contrataré un interprete" -- literally, I will hire an interpreter.If you are simply going to call a friend or co-worker that can function as an interpreter, but is not in the usual occupation of being an interpreter, you would say: "Encontraré un interprete" -- literally, I will find an interpreter.
How would you create an ou named Simpson from the command line?
How would you create an OU named SIMPSON from the command line? dsadd ou "ou=Simpson,dc=simpdomain, dc=com" dsadd Simpson ou Simpson ou dsadd It's not possible to create OUs from the command line
Why UNIX commands are divided into internal and external commands?
An internal command is one that is built in to the shell interpreter and is likely to be used quite a bit. An external command is a file in a directory that can be searched, loaded, and executed. The reason for having internal commands is for performance; it takes a lot less time to have the shell just execute the given internal command than it would take to find it on the system, load it into memory, and then execute it.
Which produces faster program execution a compiler or pure interpreter?
A compiled program would execute faster than an interpreter running the same code step by step.
Would you say foreign language interpreter or translator?
Either. It's your preference.
