No I don't think it would.If you want to my opinion is NO that's wrong.If your in that situation I think you should find a nearby job.So that way you could still maintain your kids and be with your wife.
They left behind there homes and some times their family because half the family would go to america to get money for the other family members.
the church get 10 dollars for toms family and if they cant get the money then no one can leave.
I believe it was more of a barter system then a money system. Services were rewarded with food and livestock. If there was no one in the family to provide food then there would be someone doing services for another family in order to get food to survive. The richest family would have many members with livestock and land.
16 Million,all to her family.
The dead person usually signs a will which states who will receive the money. If you receive the money then i guess that is called inheritance??
so it will be more money i guess only
To get paid even more money!!
It depends. How well do you know this person and was the deceased or did the situation leave them broke? If the situation left them broke, then it would be appropriate to leave some money in the sympathy card to show you REALLY care. If the situation didn't leave them broke or leave them with a loss of money, then a sympathy card without money would be appropriate. Also, if the person is in debt or financial trouble, sending money would also be o.k., but other than that, it wouldn't be appropriate to include money in a sympathy card.
Because they wanted to.
The Jones family would save money on energy costs.
Totally! The family who keeps the money could give it back but decides to keep it is considered stealing
No you would not get arrested.