No, maximising throughput does not necessarily mean maximising turnaround time.
Throughput is a measure of how many operations can be performed in a period of time. Turnaround is a measure of how long it takes to perform an operation.
If you optimize latency and/or overhead, you can increase throughput and decrease turnaround time.
On the other hand, if you create parallel processing, you can increase throughput without decreasing turnaround.
One can find a business turnaround plan at Michigan Turnaround Plan's website. Additionaly, one can also find a turnaround plan at Hewlett-Packard, which would be run under Meg Whitman.
ADSL
A turnaround strategy for commercial banks would be canvassing the CASA accounts. CASA are low cost funds. With a CORE banking facility and utmost service the banks can get CASA good business.
Not necessarily. But if it would benefit others then I would do it.
yes
The max distance of a 802.11n router is approximately 100 feet. This distance is usually considerably shorter in most homes due to interference.
Not necessarily but it would be strange
ISP.
If you mean a Clean Bill of Lading it is a document (or series of documents) that have no leins, restrictions or other encumbrances which would deny throughput entry into a foreign port of entry.
Under the Lean Thinking angle of view, Quality and Productivity are the 2 sides of the same medal. They go hand-in-hand. They are allied, not enemies. They are not antithetic.The lean philosophy targets at maximising both Quality and Productivity because it targets at maximising Value: Quality and Productivity are the 2 most essential ingredients of Value.Under the Lean philosophy, improving the one at the expenses of the other would be "handicapped".
Not necessarily, but it would be very difficult.
Explain why a niche company might have an advantage in a market would price necessarily be an advantage explain why or why not