NO.... thetrickle-down- theory does not work it was put in place hoping that if you give the rich a tax break they would then make jobs for the poor....... we all know that to be false, if you give rich tax breaks they buy more Yates and planes with there money... American people are selfish and greedy... you can not leave it up to the rich to help the economy that's stupid. Reaganomics has major flaws in it and its the main reason why our economy is in such bad shape now, sure at the time it seemed like a great idea, but we are sulfuring now.
Reaganomics is the program of austerity put in place by the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. It included a 20-percent cut in the top income tax rate (from 70 to 50 percent) and drastic cuts in non-defense government spending. Reaganomics caused an 18-month contraction of the economy and the highest U3 unemployment rate, 10.8 percent, ever recorded since the government started calculating it. Reaganomics didn't work; in 1982 the government enacted a law called the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act that repealed a lot of the Reaganomics reforms. They did not, however, repeal the tax cuts, and they should have. The selling point of tax cuts is that by cutting taxes on rich people they will create jobs and new products and bring more revenue into the government than you would have had at the old tax rates. This selling point ignores something that is crucial to destroying it: no businessman creates a job unless he has work for that person to do.
Reaganomics is the program of austerity put in place by the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. It included a 20-percent cut in the top income tax rate (from 70 to 50 percent) and drastic cuts in non-defense government spending. Reaganomics caused an 18-month contraction of the economy and the highest U3 unemployment rate, 10.8 percent, ever recorded since the government started calculating it. Reaganomics didn't work; in 1982 the government enacted a law called the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act that repealed a lot of the Reaganomics reforms. They did not, however, repeal the tax cuts, and they should have. The selling point of tax cuts is that by cutting taxes on rich people they will create jobs and new products and bring more revenue into the government than you would have had at the old tax rates. This selling point ignores something that is crucial to destroying it: no businessman creates a job unless he has work for that person to do.
Less complex that today
Well, "I saw you today" would work just fine.
I saw her today at work in soho. I would guess about 5"8/9. I saw her today at work in soho. I would guess about 5"8/9.
Yes, we do use Louis Pasteur's work in our work today, because he would experiment and use microscopes to find disease, and that what is done today to find if something has germs in it.
No, I don't think direct democracy would work today. I say this because democracy comes with high costs and high risks resulting to conflict and riots.
structural engineering
Reaganomics were also commonly known as 'supply-side' economics. By lowering taxes on businesses, they would make more money, grow, and ultimately, pay more in taxes do to their bigger size.In short, lowering taxes would mean more revenue for the U.S.Did not work.
Because without her most orphaned and sick people would be ignored, especially today.
"Will" is used for actions or events that are happening in the future or to express a strong intention. For example, "I will go to the store." "Would" is the past tense of "will" and is used to express a hypothetical situation or polite requests. For example, "I would go if I had time."
If your boss asked you to work for free today what would you say?