0
A soldier would not only be justified it would be his duty to disobey an unlawful order.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who would the soldiers pray to before battle?
Who did the greek soldiers pray for before battle
In ww1 how did the army get soldiers?
men would visit a recruiting office if they were 17 or over. if the army was low on soldiers, they would randomly pick men out from a crowd.
Would you like to have been a mongol soldier?
No i dont want to be a mongol soldiers i want to be united states soldiers.
What if the soldiers ran out of ammo?
Then they would have lost, friend.
How many soldiers in ww1 had lice?
well we don't no for sure how many soldiers had lice but what we do know is that most of the British and German soldiers suffered from serious cases of lice. sometimes the soldiers would spend their day picking of lice from their clothing and out from their hair this would be one of the highlights of their day! strange but true! as i said earlier we don't know how many soldiers actually had lice for sure.
Is there a punishment to a soldier disobeying direct unlawful order?
He/she would be subject to martial court and depending on the circumstances, may be dishonorably discharged. The court will determine whether or not the soldier had a right to disobey such orders he/she felt were worth disobeying. There are situations where a soldier may legally disobey orders of a higher ranking officer, an example would be if the soldier were ordered to kill innocent civilians and refused
Is it right if you are going to be shot that you shoot the person who is going to kill you like kill them or they kill you sort of thing?
In a war there is no right or wrong. A soldiers' duty is to protect him/her self and his/her comrades and follow orders unless the orders come from a disreputable source. In a civil context you would be justified shooting someone only for self protection, though this would depend on which country you live in.
What kind of protection did soldiers have during ancient egypt?
Ancient Egyptian soldiers lived in a cupboard. They would be tortured by the pharaohs iif they would come out before his orders. Mostly they would be in palacees or training but occasionsly would enter the cupboard
How did Hitler get his soldiers to kill all the innocent children and babies?
He commanded them, and if they didn't follow his orders, they themselves would be exterminated.
What are the appropriateness of civil war disobedience to achieve a goal?
Rather obscure question. You may be referring to Lincoln's illegal jailing of Maryland's pro-Southern leaders, in order to stop that state from voting Confederate. Most (Northern!) people would call that action justified. Or you may be talking about Generals disobeying orders in pursuit of some greater good. For example, D.C. Buell captured Nashville against orders - a successful move. Also in Nashville, George Thomas did not attack the Army of Tennessee as promptly as Grant wanted, though again no-one could possibly fault Thomas's actions.
How would you have justified burning settlers cabins?
Burning settlers' cabins would be justified because they were considered as invaders of the land.
What event caused you Japan to invade Manchuria?
Japanese soldiers stage an explosion at their own railroad station and then blamed it on the Chinese.therefore it would look justified when they attacked and the league of notions couldn't condemn them
Where did the phrase you're grounded originate?
This is just a thought but it makes sense that this term would probably have originated from a military term of a pilot being "grounded" due to disobeying orders, some other error/mistake the pilot may have made, or any other misc. reason that would cause the pilot to be assigned to a desk.
Would soldiers ever be justified in refusing the order to fight?
The idea of whether a soldier would be justified in refusing the order to fight in World War 2 is a matter of personal opinion. Some believe that when you are called to serve your country in this manner you are obligated to do so. With the amount of deaths and injuries associated with this war others feel that a person should have had the right to make this decision for themselves, especially if they had families they were leaving behind.
Why was johnny justified in killing bob?
Killing someone is not justified unless it is in self-defense or defense of others in imminent danger. If Johnny killed Bob without valid cause, it would not be considered justified.
Where would war not be justified?
Everywhere, but our governments still do it anyway.
Why did the Alamo Mexican soldiers not spare soldiers lives?
They were ordered to kill all the Texan soldiers at the Alamo, and as soldiers they obeyed their orders, whether they wanted to or not. Santa Anna had promised that the entire garrison would be killed if resistance was offered. He kept that promise, sparing only the two civilians he captured. Santa Anna wanted to break the Texan will to fight by convincing them that any resistance to Mexico meant certain death.
