there would be no more red pandas
That would affect the food cycle, less production.
Because then it would damage the circle of life!
we are killing pandas food by tearing down trees it does not help are economy and kills pandas.
No, as the groundhog is not present in all the world. Mainly the USA.
yes because there are people who love pandas and are trying to keep the population f pandas growing so there will be pandas all around the world instead of in our social studies books. It affects how much bamboo grows because if the pandas don't eat the bamboo it will die and no more will grow.
For the most part, the extinction of the species would not really impact the world to much degree, besides the small disruption it would entail on the local ecosystem
The white tiger would normally control the population of its prey, but facing extinction, the tigers prey will flourish and overpopulate. (: Hope that helps.
The Giant Panda has been hunted nearly to extinction because of the high price people will pay for its meat, which is considered a delicacy in most parts of the world.
Other than the fact that pandas are most peoples favorite animal, pandas help with there warm fur! people use panda fur to make many things including sweaters, blankets and more! But even without that stuff people would miss the pandas. Especially since they are so many peoples favorite animal, and everyone floods the zoos to see them!
there would be more pandas in the world
Almost certainly. Anytime you remove an apex predator from the environment, the entire food chain suffers. But happily, neither species are in any danger of extinction now. The world population of black bears is over 900,000, that of the brown bear over 300,000. Source; World Wildlife Fund
Pandas help to preserve plants, landscapes, and other animals. They help to keep species like the takin and crested ibis alive. They help to spread the seeds of bamboo forests as they eat. Without pandas, none of these things would remain living for long.