No, as the groundhog is not present in all the world. Mainly the USA.
That would affect the food cycle, less production.
Because then it would damage the circle of life!
there would be no more red pandas
For the most part, the extinction of the species would not really impact the world to much degree, besides the small disruption it would entail on the local ecosystem
The white tiger would normally control the population of its prey, but facing extinction, the tigers prey will flourish and overpopulate. (: Hope that helps.
Almost certainly. Anytime you remove an apex predator from the environment, the entire food chain suffers. But happily, neither species are in any danger of extinction now. The world population of black bears is over 900,000, that of the brown bear over 300,000. Source; World Wildlife Fund
They are beautiful animals, and are on the verge of extinction. All measures should be taken to keep these priceless animals.
the end of the world as we kno it
overpopulation would result in, if I were to guesstimate, reduction of food supply and extinction of more animals which would cause a lot of the reduced food supply. We would have to turn to vegetarians. But then, we would use the ground too much and eventually render it useless soil from over planting.In all, it's not a good thing.
Well, the extinction of the dinosaurs makes it a lot easier for people to survive.
yes because there are people who love pandas and are trying to keep the population f pandas growing so there will be pandas all around the world instead of in our social studies books. It affects how much bamboo grows because if the pandas don't eat the bamboo it will die and no more will grow.
No.