Essentially yes. Some things will have moved, like the planets and the Moon. Jupiter is a good example, as it takes just under 12 years to orbit the sun, so it advances by one of the zodiac constellations each year. The Moon would be in a different position, if you can see it at all. Stars will also have moved, but by such a tiny amount at the distance we are from them, you would not notice, even in a lifetime, never mind one year. So apart from the moon and any planets that would be visible, the sky would look the same if you are observing on the same date from the same location. That in itself is one of the nice things, in that you know what you will see at any given time of the year from any given place.
Galileo
Im thinkin that it was made when he decided to look up at the sky one night and decided he would make an astronomical observation. idk just that's how i would make an oservation of the sky. [Rosco P. Coltrain]
Mars rotates about it's axis, so if you were to stay at close to one point on mars for a martian day, then for half the day you would face the sun(day), then later on when mars had rotated round, the part of mars you were on would not be facing the sun(night).
# Ancient records of SN 185 could be the earliest written description of a supernova. # It may have shown that the night sky was not a permanent fixture # It would certainly have "scared" a few people, not knowing what it was
The star's position appears to shift slightly in the night sky during the year.
No.
There is a few ways to stay an animal. Staying an animal over night with testing.
When you observe through a telescope at night, so wherever you would do that.
Jews observe the Sabbath from Friday night at sundown, until Saturday night at sundown.
-- look in the sky, at least twice at different times of the same night, and compare the positions of the objects you see -- if you observe closely and recall the appearance of objects in the sky in reasonable detail, the change should be obvious within a half-hour
If you are an astronomer and your subject of observation is not Earth's sun, then yes observing at night is better.
Meaning depends on context and audience. For instance, you could make the observation that President Obama is black but this would be a pointless observation since most people already know it. In fact the observation is so obvious the president used it as a joke on a late night TV channel.So for an observation to be meaningful it needs to be pertinent, relevant, timely, precise and accurate.If we are trying to launch a vehicle into space and you note that the acceleration constant for the earth's gravity had changed by 1percent. This would be startling, timely, and maybe even alarming. If it turned out that the measurement was not repeatable the observation would be not be meaningful. It would probably just be annoying.For the most part in science, the most meaningful observations are repeatable.
telescopes
sucking his dick
I can give you several sentences.The observation tower loomed over the nearby buildings.You are under observation for your chest pain, and need to spend the night in hospital.This is your observation period; if you do well during the next few weeks, the manager will give you a raise.
Perhaps you had a clear sky. This may happen after a rain. It is also possible that the lights of the city went out - lots of lights make it difficult to observe the night sky. Or perhaps you went out of the city, to an area where the sky was clearer. In any case, I would not say that the sky was back to normal - it was back to abnormal.Perhaps you had a clear sky. This may happen after a rain. It is also possible that the lights of the city went out - lots of lights make it difficult to observe the night sky. Or perhaps you went out of the city, to an area where the sky was clearer. In any case, I would not say that the sky was back to normal - it was back to abnormal.Perhaps you had a clear sky. This may happen after a rain. It is also possible that the lights of the city went out - lots of lights make it difficult to observe the night sky. Or perhaps you went out of the city, to an area where the sky was clearer. In any case, I would not say that the sky was back to normal - it was back to abnormal.Perhaps you had a clear sky. This may happen after a rain. It is also possible that the lights of the city went out - lots of lights make it difficult to observe the night sky. Or perhaps you went out of the city, to an area where the sky was clearer. In any case, I would not say that the sky was back to normal - it was back to abnormal.
Bis bald- see you later und- and gute Nacht- good night. So, 'see you later and good night!'