The U.S. Supreme Court would not be involved unless the case had already been decided and appealed. For instance, the Mirandadecision came from the Supreme Court because a man wasn't told his rights when he was arrested as dictated by the constitution so the court ruled. It would have to be something along that line.
However, the New York Supreme Court is the state's trial court (which would handle a jewelry robbery). If you're doing a crossword or something like that, I'll bet that's what they are referencing.
It would have to be 'appealed' to several levels of the state court system before it reached the supreme court level, but, yes, it could.
It's possible - it depends on where the crime took place (i.e.; on federal property?) - or in the case of certain named felonies they exercise original jurisdiction (i.e.; bank robbery).
The State Supreme Court
Criminal court is the system that will handle a robbery case. This type of court system allows jury members to make the verdict but the judge will determine your jail time.
Criminal court is the system that will handle a robbery case. This type of court system allows jury members to make the verdict but the judge will determine your jail time.
Criminal court is the system that will handle a robbery case. This type of court system allows jury members to make the verdict but the judge will determine your jail time.
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
The US Supreme Court is the highest court of the land, and is the end of the line for appeals in all courts.There is no limitation on what types of cases can be heard, only that a federal or constitutional question be brought, and that it be significant enough that the court grants cert.Added: It will be assumed that a negligent surgery case would be brought in the STATE courts, therefore that the "Supreme Court" referred to would be the STATE Supreme Court. In that case it would be necessary for such a case to be fought through the lower levels of the court system, and then be accepted by the court for review, to even reach such a possibility.
A civil or criminal court can handle a case like that , it would most likely be in criminal court and if they were unable to take the case it would handed up to a court like the state supreme court after it was tried in a lower court.
The correct name is the Supreme Court of the United States, but most people refer to it as the US Supreme Court. Each state has its own Supreme Court, but the US Supreme Court is the end of the line.
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States.That would be the Supreme Court.
This would be the state supreme court for a particular US state.supreme court
The Supreme Court does not use a jury. The Supreme Court is involved in interpretations of the US constitution. A jury would not help.
Yethreb has a real problem. The Ohio Supreme Court is an appellate court, not a trial court.If a person convicted of armed robbery appeals to the state supreme court and loses, and if the case raises a question of federal or constitutional law, then "Yethreb" could petition the US Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, requesting they review her case. Statistically, her chance of being heard by the high court is less than 1%.If the case does not involve a question of federal or constitutional law, then "Yethreb" has exhausted her appeals. If her attorney can't find acceptable grounds for a rehearing or new trial, the decision of the Ohio Supreme Court is final.