It probably would it would just be at a much slower rate and a lot less of a threat to the environment
It is difficult to determine an exact temperature without global warming, as natural climate variability would still exist. However, scientists estimate that without human-induced global warming, average temperatures would likely be lower than they are today.
people would not coplain about global warming
Global warming
If you were asked to speak in a debate, "Against man-made Global Warming" you would be arguing that man is not causing Global Warming. You would have to argue that Global Warming is occurring naturally.
no.the global warming won't benefit anyone
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
No. Global warming is caused by man burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. No other animal does that. If there were no humans on earth, there would be no global warming.
If global warming affects the ozone hole, the UV will come in. This will lead to more global warming.
No one would want to have global warming being caused by humans. That is not a logical position for anyone. Zero percent would WANT man induced global warming.
Global warming would have no affect on the location of the poles.
No, and I'd be delighted if You would Join Me in Asking "Why Are There No Laws Regulating Global Warming?". Bc
No, volcanoes would have nothing to do with global warming in any measurable way. Volcanoes occur for reasons outside of the issues involved with global warming.