Yes, without a doubt. Maybe the south would have won without the transportation benefits of the Erie canal, I doubt it though.
Abraham Lincoln was President of the USA at the time of the civil war and as such he would have been Commander in Chief.
Much bigger population from which to recruit armies.
The Civil War could have been avoided in various ways. There had to be an agreement on how the government would be run that would have eliminated slavery, yet preserved prospects for occasional minority rule by bigots of all stripes, the utterly stupid and the irredeemably inhumane....
That would have been the battle at Gettysburg.
Slavery would still be in action and would be the Confederate States of America and our sixteenth president would have been Jefferson Davis.
That would have been the Panama Canal.
If the Canal had been open, the commute between Cuba and the Philippines would have been easier.
No. If he had there would have not been a need for the 1964 civil rights act.
The Suez Canal was the first canal to separate two major land masses and allow boats and ships to pass inbetween. The Panama Canal was created soon after the Suez, as the Suez Canal proved that a canal could be built that would separate two continents. Without the Suez, the Panama Canal may have never been funded and made. ~Ares
Without technology, the Erie Canal would not have been possible. The land rose 600 feet between the Hudson and Lake Erie. Because of this, 50 locks were needed to complete the 363 mile canal.
Because it was the thinest place to cut across being only sixty miles long.
The Suez Canal connects the Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of Suez. This typically would have been dug by hand, but the canal utilized new steam technology and dredging systems to create the canal. When Egypt took over the Suez Canal Company, it marked the end of the British Empire's control on the area.
Yes, there have been many.
Slaves would have still been a big deal. The South would have been one nation.
It's impossible to answer this type of question. The canal might have been built in Nicaragua instead because of the politics and costs involved.
the panama canal has been around since 1914
There probably would have been slavery to this day