You are not being very clear....would what help or hurt plant's ability to spread to new places? I don't know what you mean when you say would this.
The most often places where one would find a betting spread would be on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. But more so than there would be Las Vegas or any International casino grounds.
You actually spread it on the ground in winter or before. If you were to place ammonia on a corn plant then it would kill it.
Vascular plants require moisture. To some extent, they can. I would guess the safest answer is 'no'.
they need to eat for 1, and they would live in different places, and if a fox got sick they would eat the plants
If it is a meat animal, the ability to convert food more efficiently into meat. And for many plants, the ability to resist diseases common to that plant.
Photosynthesis would come to a halt, glucose would no longer be produced.
Germination fertilizers seeds and helps them spread. Without it many plants would not be able to produce babies.
If earth had no carbon dioxide then no plants (or animals) would have ever evolved because they all need it for respiration to take place.
yes it helps to stop sreading diseases as it would sprea i
well, the obvious answer would be that more plants would be able to survive but the disadvantage would be that there would nothing except wind that would spread the pollens of the plants and plus there would be no 'natural' fertilizers (such as cow dung) that would help the plants grow.
The plants will happily live on. Plants do not need animals to live, though animals must have plants. Plants can produce both oxygen and carbon dioxide. Without animals to spread their pollen, however, some plants would have to find new ways to reproduce.
It is a tropical area so you would find flowers and plants that grow well in hot humid places.