If you are talking about our current war, then yes, it would. The U.S. launched an unprovoked* attack on Another Country. This is definitely seen as an act of war, even if done with good intentions.
*The provocation was a relatively small terrorist group, not the country as a whole, therefore, it could be seen as unprovoked.
In the related links box below, I posted a good article on the 1871 War on Terror.
The name of the most recent war fought by the United States was Operation Enduring Freedom in Iraq. There are still ongoing interdictions that are still occurring.
The War on Terror
M-16
So is a dog
Because terrorist and terror organizations are located in many locations around the planet.
War causes terror, so how can war be a solution to terror?
The 'War Against Terror' is still ongoing, so, not enough, it would seem.
Process of assembling troops and supplies and making them ready for war [in 1914, this was considered an act of war]
Both the War on Drugs and the War on Terror have created controversies having to do with privacy. For example, the War on Drugs loosened what is considered unreasonable search and seizure, while the policies of the War on Terror have resulted in many well known cases of the US government spying on its own citizens.
The answer would be the French War. The Reign of Terror is also known as The Terror or la Terreur in French. This began in September of 1793 and ended in July of 1794.
Most signers did not read the amendment before signing the bill
an act of war was when somebody did something that offended some one else
an act of war
no
the war on terror is between the United States and Iraq
There are a few things that can be considered an open act of war. Some include attacking another country or people, mass murder of civilians, and terrorist attacks.