answersLogoWhite

0

yes I think they would because think about it would probably be one of the reasons why the earth would be destroyed Considering that we don't know how, when or if a third world war will occur, any answer would be entirely conjectural

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How many times an we destroy the world with nuclear weapons?

It is difficult to provide an exact number as the use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic global consequences, potentially leading to nuclear winter and widespread devastation. It is imperative to prevent the use of such weapons to protect life on Earth.


Who would USSR use nuclear weapons on?

nobody


How did the use of nuclear weapons change the cause of world war 2?

The use of atomic weapons brought it to an end..........


Can Nuclear Weapons destroy the World and the planet?

Nuclear weapons have the potential to cause massive devastation, including widespread destruction and loss of life. However, it is unlikely that they could completely destroy the world or the planet itself. The use of nuclear weapons would have catastrophic consequences with long-lasting impacts on the environment and civilization.


Why doesn't the US use nuclear weapons?

The US has refrained from using nuclear weapons due to the catastrophic human and environmental consequences associated with their use. Additionally, the world community, including the US, has generally upheld international agreements and norms that seek to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.


How has uranium changed the world?

The principal changes are: - fabrication of nuclear weapons - creation of nuclear power reactors - use of depleted uranium in weapons


In the world of today would any country dare use Nuclear weapons. This excludes terrorist groups.?

Yes USA


Did they use nuclear weapons in the holocaust?

No, Nazi Germany had no nuclear weapons.


Who developed the term 'Thermonuclear war' and how does it differ from conventional nuclear war?

"Thermonuclear" is a term derived from the science of physics, and was not developed by any one person, to describe a type of weapon and the type of war the use of such a weapon would create. All the ready-to-fire nuclear weapons in the world today are thermonuclear weapons -- there is no difference.Therefore the type of 'war' their use would create would be no different.Also, there is no such thing as a 'conventional nuclear war'; the term makes no sense whatsoever. Conventionalmeans non-nuclear conflict (tanks, planes, men, etc.), nuclear means use of nuclear weapons. The moment a conventional war escalates to the use of nuclear weapons, it ceases to be conventional.So remember, thermonuclear war is the same as nuclear war; they do not differ.


Why does the government use A LOT of money on nuclear weapons if they don't even use them?

The government must keep up with nuclear technology with regard to weaponry for the simple fact that other nations are armed in like fashion. If we disarmed, other nations who have nuclear weapons would not (because some of them are really evil). We do "use" them (in a sense) to remind the despots and terrorists of the world that we have them. Failing to maintain armament superiority in the eyes of the world would be tantamount to being the kid who gets beaten every day by bullies in the school-yard. Nuclear weapons are (unfortunately) necessary to maintain peace and stability in the world today.


Why do you have nuclear weapons?

Some of the countries have nuclear weapons because they use them as a defense mechanism. The nuclear weapons are intended to be used whenever there is a war.


Did the US use non nuclear weapons against japan?

the u.s. used non nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons against japan