Want this question answered?
In general, diversity would be desireable in a society or social setting. The group as a whole would benefit from having different skills, talents, opinions and points of view. Of course, the group has to be tolerant and willing to accept diversity; otherwise the diversity would cause conflict.
Many countries would benefit from technologies such as hydroponics. The smallest of these is the European nation of Luxembourg.
Because every countries are looking for benefit...
It would help the nation's diversity and also their tolerance to other races/values. This could benefit everyone by creating a multicultural population.
A state can benefit from having natural resources because it would not have to import resources from different countries and states, thus, not having to pay for the long transport from other countries and states
Governments would benefit from being less dependent on imported energy because they could use the money in their own countries on creating new, better ways to get energy and that would save them money because they would not have to rely on other countries to get energy.
You would use a cost-benefit analysis to see what the best approach would be to a problem. It helps you know what alternative is best in terms of effort, time, and cost.
The manufacturer would have access to additional markets in other countries.
per se? none Diversity for the sake of diversity: that's pure folly
Race, or "cultural diversity" as you put it, should not be a factor at all.
Because The Germans would Be surrounded between the 2 countries and have to fight both countries it war broke out
I would not say that diversity is necessary for organizational success, but I would say, the education, training and understanding of diversity in organizations where it does exist is critical to its success.