Without seeing the question, it is hard to say whether or not your answer to part D would be different if you only looked at the graphs on page 396 in your text. One would have to think the answer would be different if you didn't take into consideration the whole problem.
in probability, you only guess. while in graphs you only draw lines. but both are boring.
A better question would be "do graphs have to do with calculus?" The answer is yes, many concepts in calculus are best understood by looking at graphs. While most concepts in calculus can be taught and learned without graphs, using only numeric and algebraic (analytical) representations, graphs add a visual representation that helps students understand calculus concepts in more depth.
Polynomials have graphs that look like graphs of their leading terms because all other changes to polynomial functions only cause transformations of the leading term's graph.
We can only speculate, and different people may have different opinions. To understand the true motive, you would have to inquire of He who placed those stars in those particular places in the sky. Or else consult the ancient individuals who looked at that group of stars, decided what it looked like to them, and gave it the name Sagittarius.
Only if they are badly presented graphs or if the person viewing them is not a visual person.
I would,but only after having it looked at and approved by a qualified gunsmith.
Bar graphs can show the law of conservation of energy by visually representing the distribution of energy between different forms or components of a system. The total energy depicted in the bar graph remains constant, demonstrating that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred between different forms.
I can only think of one drawback to graphs, and that is that some people don't understand them. They are used because they have so many advantages. There are several educational initiatives which help the proper understanding of graphs.
The main problem with bar graphs are that they can only be used when all values for x are discrete and have equal weight. For instance, if we wanted to do a graph of how many people liked different colours, we could do a bar graph. Because the x axis would have values "blue" "yellow" "green" etc. and these would be discrete answers. If we wanted to do a graph of people's weight vs their height, you could not use a bar graph. This is because height would not fit into neat categories like colour does.
I have looked on so many different web pages and there are only 30 trophies you can get.
It could imply that a thicker bar means that particular value was greater, when in fact only the height is important in bar graphs.
it would be a good idea only If you are good at making your own clothing and it looked professional.