It could imply that a thicker bar means that particular value was greater, when in fact only the height is important in bar graphs.
It could skip numbers, such as if you are counting by 3's (3,6,9,12,15) then it could have wrong numbers, and there could also be other misleading stuff too. +++ It could be misleading if the values themselves are incorrect, or if the line is a best-fit trace drawn erroneously, perhaps on a graph of points that genuinely do not really follow a discreet numerical law.
Blanchard's use of statistics can be misleading due to selective presentation or interpretation of data that may not fully represent the broader context. By focusing on specific figures or trends that support a particular narrative, he may overlook or downplay data that could contradict his claims. Additionally, the choice of statistical methods or the omission of relevant variables can lead to skewed conclusions, potentially misinforming the audience about the actual situation. This selective framing can distort the overall understanding of the issues being analyzed.
you could use different line styles (a solid or dotted line) or you can use different colored lines.
could a sample set have the same range but different means
It's an adverb, so it can modify either "similar" or "different." For instance, you could say that two brothers look starkly similar. You could also say that turnips and sweet potatoes are both root vegetables but are starkly different in taste. In practice, "starkly" is used most frequently to indicate difference.
"Accurate" in what sense? They're accurate in the same way that a picture is accurate, because that's essentially what they are: pictures that use a different kind of light. They could potentially be misleading or ambiguous, but that doesn't make them any less accurate.
It could skip numbers, such as if you are counting by 3's (3,6,9,12,15) then it could have wrong numbers, and there could also be other misleading stuff too. +++ It could be misleading if the values themselves are incorrect, or if the line is a best-fit trace drawn erroneously, perhaps on a graph of points that genuinely do not really follow a discreet numerical law.
could get hacked or be misleading.
Incorrectly plotted points.
A circumstance that appears to be something different, or even opposite, could be called misleading, or deceptive, or spurious.
"Lun" is not a standard English word. It could potentially be a misspelling or a word in a different language.
Hearsay is not allowed at trial because it is considered unreliable and lacks the opportunity for cross-examination. Allowing hearsay as evidence could potentially lead to the introduction of false or misleading information, which could impact the fairness and accuracy of the legal process.
To find two widths that equal 44 inches when combined, you can use the equation (x + y = 44), where (x) and (y) are the two widths. For example, if you choose (x = 20) inches, then (y) would equal (24) inches, as (20 + 24 = 44). Alternatively, you could choose (x = 10) inches and (y = 34) inches, since (10 + 34 = 44) as well.
The opposite could be dishonest, deceitful, disingenuous, or misleading.
"Lisiewski" does not have a specific meaning in Polish. It could potentially be a surname or a variation of a word with a different spelling and meaning.
This question could be misleading but I would say no
The title "The Loner" by Julie Holder may not be suitable because it could potentially reinforce negative stereotypes about people who prefer solitude. It might also give a misleading impression of the book's content or themes, potentially alienating readers who do not identify as loners. Additionally, it could limit the book's appeal to a broader audience by suggesting a narrow focus on one specific character trait.