answersLogoWhite

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2010-02-25 20:06:05

the separation of power

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Your Answer

Loading...

Still Have Questions?

Related Questions

With the words we the people the Constitution establishes its authority on the basis of what?

Popular sovreignty


With the words you the People the Constitution establishes its authority on the basis of?

The phrase is actually 'we the people.' With these words, the United States Constitution established its authority on the basis of popular sovereignty.


Much of the declaration of independence consists of what?

with the word we the people the constitution establishes its authority on the basis of


With the words 'we the people' the US Constitution established its authority on the basis of which constitutional principle?

popular sovereignty (the people rule).


What is the highest authority in the nation?

The highest authority in the nation is the US Constitution. It forms the basis of the government, determines which of the laws are legal, and protects the rights of the American people.


What is the basis for the authority of courts?

(in the US) the three branches of government are established by the US Constitution.


What is the basis for studying the Philippine constitution?

to protect the rights of citizen against arbitrary action in the authority.


Where does the basis for congressional regulatory authority lie in congress?

inference that it can because the constitution does not say that it cannot


What is the constitutional basis for the president's cabinet?

The constitution gives the president the authority to appoint officers. The president is thus able to appoint people to his cabinet to assist him in the task of executing the laws.


From where does the constitution derive it's authority?

The Constitution derives its authority from the consent of the governed. This is a principle idea of the philosopher John Locke, and arguably the entire basis for the American Revolution. It means that the only way a government can have power is if the people want it to. The only reason the Constitution has any authority at all is that people are willing to obey it. Although this may seem self-explanatory, it was a big difference from older ideas of a king's god-given right to rule. Locke was radical in his idea that people were not sinning if they revolted against corruption.


What is the legal basis for studying the 1987 Philippine Constitution?

to protect thge rights of citizen against arbitrary action in the authority.


What is the presence of election through popular will?

The presence of election through popular will is the constitution. The will of the people is the basis of the authority of the government. Every citizen is given the free will to vote and take part in conduct of public affairs.


What is the legal basis for studying Philippine constitution?

what is the legal basis in stadying constitution


What is Article 25 of constitution of japan?

It is the article that establishes the legal basis for the Japanese welfare state. It is a device to allow politicians to use public money supposedly in order to improve the standards of living of the people, but in practice it works as any other welfare state scheme.


What document served as the basis for the US Constitution?

the bill of rights is the document that served as a basis for the us Constitution.


What main belief is shared by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution?

The main belief shared by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is government by the people and for the people. This belief is the basis of the American government.


Which amendment in the Constitution prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender in American schools?

9th, it declares any rights of the people not said in the Constitution already are ordained.


What is the basis of US laws?

Constitution


How does the constitution effect us today?

The United States Constitution effects all Americans because it forms the basis of the Law of The Land. Written by act of Convention in 1787, it created the Federal Government and establishes the Executive Branch, Legislature, and Judiciary. Gives each specific powers and establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure no one branch holds all the power. Within the Constitution you also find powers reserved to the Central Government also called The Federal Government and powers reserved to the State Governments. The first 10 Amendments to the Constitution establish what is called the Bill of Rights, or the basic liberties given to the "people" of the United States.


What is judicial immunity?

To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt>


Was the Bill of Rights the basis of the constitution?

No. The document Virginia Declaration of Rights became the basis for the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States of America.


What is the constitutional basis for the reserved powers?

The reserved powers clause is just another name for the 10th Amendment to the Constitution. It states that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Essentially, it gives states the authority to make their own rules regarding issues like marriage and education.


What document is the basis of the America government?

the constitution


What concept is the basis for the constitution?

executive privilege


Is the basis of your democracy in America the constitution?

Yes, the constutition of the united states is the basis for our democracy.