0
Zinn's argument centers around the idea that history should be presented from the perspective of marginalized groups, challenging traditional narratives that often omit their experiences. By highlighting the voices and struggles of these groups, Zinn aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of historical events and the impact of power dynamics. This approach can be seen as persuasive in urging readers to critically assess the biases present in mainstream historical accounts.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did Jefferson's list of grievances made his argument more or less convincing?
Does this list make his argument more or less convincing? Why?
Does Charles beard make a convincing argument?
No.
You use logic to construct a convincing argument in order to persuade someone this is referred to as?
An argument.
What is Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 are they convincing?
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
Why is the politician's argument not very convincing?
It confuses correlation with causation
What is a convincing argument that logically shows why a conjecture is true?
It is a proof.
What is a convincing argument that logically shows why a conjecture is true is called a?
It's called a proof
How do you put cogent in a sentence?
She presented a cogent argument that convinced the audience of her point.
What is one way that the student could improve his or her argument?
You could say, "There is no point convincing you that you are wrong."
Is cogent an adverb?
No, "cogent" is not an adverb. It is an adjective used to describe an argument or point that is clear, logical, and convincing.
Is the design argument a convincing argument?
The design argument, which posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest a designer, is convincing to some people because it provides a logical explanation for the existence of complex systems. However, others find it unconvincing due to alternative explanations, like natural selection, and the lack of direct evidence for a designer. Ultimately, the persuasiveness of the design argument can vary depending on an individual's perspective and beliefs.
How do you have judge rule in your favor?
By having the most convincing argument backed up by the facts necessary to prove your innocence.
