Want this question answered?
No evidence at all and much evidence given by Charles Darwin's children that Lady Hope was a complete fraud.
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
Darwin, of course. Lamarck did not have the evidence to back up his acquired characteristics and use and disuse concepts, but Darwin had massive amounts of evidence and well structured arguments for his theory of natural selection.
Yes, but it needs some additions like Mendelian Genetics that Darwin did not have. These additions have already been made.
No. There is no real evidence about that
the three sources of information Charles Darwin used to come up with his theory are: farmers and animal breeders, geologists, and the work of thomas malthus
Darwin's theory of common descent states that all organisms _____.
descent with modification
darwin This was in his work 'The Descent of Man.'
Darwin used the phrase "descent with modification" (he didn't use the term "evolution")
descent. Darwin was of the first to suggest this.
two special share
Descent with modification. Or. Transubstantiation.
He explained them in terms of descent with modification, common descent and natural selection.
evidences against Darwin
Monkeys
The theory that Darwin developed after traveling on the HMS Beagle is known as the theory of evolution by natural selection. It proposes that species evolve over time through processes such as natural selection, where individuals with advantageous traits are more likely to survive and reproduce.