what is the disadcantages of trial by ordeal
Ordeal of the Century was created in 2020-11.
no it was not
Trial by ordeal was a medieval practice where the accused underwent a physical test to determine guilt or innocence, believed to be divinely inspired. Trial by jury is a legal proceeding where a group of citizens listen to evidence and testimony to determine guilt or innocence based on the facts presented.
Trial by jury involves a group of impartial individuals who decide the verdict based on evidence presented in court, while trial by ordeal relies on a physical test or ritual to determine guilt or innocence, often involving supernatural elements. Trial by jury is based on reasoned analysis and legal principles, while trial by ordeal is based on superstition and a belief in divine intervention.
The belief then during the Middle Ages was that he who has not done wrong will be protected by the gods and that by doing the trial by ordeal, the innocent ones would survive the ordeal as they will be protected by the gods.
I do not have any idea sorry
Trial by ordeal did not originate in the Middle Ages. It probably developed in prehistory, but certainly existed in the earliest historic periods. There is a link below.
an extremely severe or trying test, experience, or trial.
Those accused of crimes began to be tried by Royal Courts. No longer was their guilt or innocence proven through trial by ordeal or combat.
cant theoretically find truth
He changed the law of justice to keep firm control if the country he ruled. Henry also worked to make the legal system fairer. Trial by ordeal and trial by combat were still common but even in the 12th century these methods were outdated.