It is possible but unlikely because the competing gravitational forces from two or more stars are very likely to make it impossible for any planet to settle into a stable orbit.
At the moment no planets have been detected, which is not surprising as it's a binary star system (possibly triple star).
Only one triple bond is possible.
Polaris (the North star - Alpha Ursae Minoris) is a triple star system, but appears to us as a single star. Alpha Centauri is also another triple star system. And there are many more.
Let's get our nomenclature right here. Alpha Centauri is a triple star system: Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B are a fairly close double of stars roughly like the Sun, and Alpha Centauri C is a much dimmer red dwarf orbiting the pair at a considerably greater distance. It just so happens that C's orbit brings it at times closer to the Sun than any other star that we currently know about. So Alpha Centauri C is sometimes itself called Proxima.
No planet we know of belongs to a triple star system. It is also, due to gravitational interactions, unlikely - but not impossible - that a planet could be formed within a triple star system.
At the moment no planets have been detected, which is not surprising as it's a binary star system (possibly triple star).
I'm not 100% sure what you mean by this but usually star systems are classed as single (Just one star), binary (meaning two stars orbiting each other), triple (three stars orbiting each other), etc... As our Sun is the only star in this system it is a single star system and therefore none of the others.
It is possible but the planetary orbit would be very strange because Rigel is really a triple star system.
Yes, they can have planets but they will not be as common as a single star system. If any planets are formed, they will generally be far away from the stars. This is because of the gravitational influences of two stars. This instability prohibits the formation of planets. Obviously, it depends on the mass of the two stars and their distance from each other. A close pair will probably not have planets whereas a major star and a far minor binary pair will not experience the same influences and planet formation could occur without the same constraint's. Our nearest binary/triple star system - Alpha Centauri has yet to have any planets detected.
The sun's mass is so much bigger than anything in our solar system that it actually pulls all of the other masses in the Milky Way to it, the planets with the bigger masses are out farther, and the smaller ones are closer, except for pluto. (because pluto's orbit is messed up due to previous momentum)
Yes, it is.
no
Yes unless your disabled......
A great question. Neptune is the the last of our major planets. Then comes a cacophany of minor planets such as Pluto, Qawar etc that expand our solar system to triple its' current known size. After that, their is the outer limits. The mystical rocky belts of indiscipherable objects where comets are born and revolve around our sun once in a billion years or so. This is where we need to learn. This is where you, we, can discover new secrets.
Yes they were. (:
Rigel is a triple star system.
Only one triple bond is possible.